Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000+

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 8100

The Mediatek Dimensity 8100 is a upper mid-range smartphone SoC. The CPU integrates four fast ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.85 GHz and four efficient Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated 5G modem supports all modern standards including 5G SA and a maximum download speed of 4.7 Gbps.

The integrated ARM Mali-G610 MC6 GPU integrates 6 cores and supports displays with up to 2,960 x 1,440 pixels (WQHD+).

The chip is produced at TSMC in 5nm.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000+

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 9000+

The MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (or 9000 Plus) is a high-end SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes one fast Cortex-X2 core with up to 3 GHz, three more A710 cores with up to 2.85 GHz and four power efficiency cores (Cortex-A510) with upto 1.8 GHz. The SoC is manufactured in the new 4nm process at TSMC. All CPU cores can together use 8 MB of level 3 cache and 6 MB of System Level Cache (SLC). Compared to the similar Dimensity 9000, the 9000 Plus offers a 200 MHz higher clocked X2 core.

The CPU Performance of the 9000+ is very good thanks to the big cores and high clock speeds. At the time of announcement, it should be the fastest SoC for Android phones and depending on the workload even best the Apple A15 of the iPhone 13 (e.g. Geekbench in Multi-Core tests). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (in the ROG Phone 6 Pro e.g.) should slightly behind the Dimensity 9000+ in single and multi-threaded tests.

The integrated quad channel memory controller supports LPDDR5X with 7500 Mbps. The integrated GPU is an ARM Mali-G710 MC10 (10 of the 16 possible cores) and should be 10% faster compared to the same iGPU in the Dimensity 9000 (thanks to higher clocks).

The Dimensity 9000+ is produced in the state of the art 4nm process at TSMC.

ModelMediaTek Dimensity 8100MediaTek Dimensity 9000+
CodenameCortex-A78 / A55Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510
Clock2000 - 2850 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Technology6 nm4 nm
Features4x ARM Cortex-A77 (2.85 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G610 MC6, APU 580, 5G Modem, MiraVision 780, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, UFS 3.1, LPDDR51x ARM Cortex-X2 (3.2 GHz), 3x A710 (2.85 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A510 (1.8 GHz), ARM Mali-G710 MC10, APU 590, Imagiq 790, 5G Modem (3GPP Release-16), LPDDR5X 7500 Mbps
iGPUARM Mali-G610 MP6ARM Mali-G710 MP10
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com
L3 Cache14 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4716     avg: 4867     median: 4866.5 (46%)     max: 5017 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
5283 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 887     avg: 922     median: 907 (35%)     max: 971 Points
min: 1383     avg: 1392     median: 1391.5 (54%)     max: 1400 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3701     avg: 3811     median: 3720 (7%)     max: 4012 Points
min: 4523     avg: 4607     median: 4606.5 (8%)     max: 4690 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
925 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3743 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4246     avg: 4423     median: 4422.5 (44%)     max: 4599 Points
min: 2510     avg: 3706     median: 3705.5 (37%)     max: 4901 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15525     avg: 15986     median: 15985.5 (16%)     max: 16446 Points
min: 2630     avg: 8482     median: 8482 (8%)     max: 14334 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4253     avg: 4355     median: 4355 (48%)     max: 4457 Points
4596 Points (51%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14527     avg: 14927     median: 14927 (22%)     max: 15327 Points
13687 Points (20%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11688     avg: 13766     median: 13765.5 (22%)     max: 15843 Points
7824 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3386     avg: 3930     median: 3929.5 (59%)     max: 4473 Points
2996 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2012 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3408 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
20773 Points (41%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9159 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11358 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1273.9     avg: 1349     median: 1326.2 (2%)     max: 1446.8 ms
856 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33046     avg: 33846     median: 33238 (25%)     max: 35255 Points
51846 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 79     avg: 86.5     median: 86.5 (24%)     max: 94 Points
128 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 101     avg: 106.7     median: 106 (19%)     max: 113 Points
152 Points (27%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 778486     avg: 802429     median: 809368 (39%)     max: 819433 Points
1091900 Points (53%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 183812     avg: 190406     median: 186897 (47%)     max: 200509 Points
283960 Points (71%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 7809     avg: 8158     median: 8158 (1%)     max: 8507 Points
8591 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
55.3 MB/s (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
917 MB/s (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
32 MB/s (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1575 MB/s (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 22269     avg: 28643     median: 28643 (13%)     max: 35017 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12684     avg: 13463     median: 13056 (48%)     max: 14650 Points
19200 Points (71%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
13844 Points (73%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
46795 Points (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
12871 Points (84%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
19297 Points (97%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 764     avg: 801     median: 789 (30%)     max: 850 Points
1045 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.47     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.344     avg: 1.7     median: 1.5 (2%)     max: 2.3 Watt
0.9 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 8100 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ → 119% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 15:02:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14523 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14617 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750770154s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:19:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14523 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14523 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14617 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14617 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.035s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)