Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800

MediaTek Dimensity 720

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 720

The Mediatek Dimensity 720 is a mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores, all clocked at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU) and video de- and encoding. Compared to the faster Dimensity 820, the CPU cores are lower clocked and the GPU offers less cores. Furthermore, all other features were slightly restricted (e.g. max. 12 GB RAM).

The Dimensity 720 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

MediaTek Dimensity 800

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800

The Mediatek Dimensity 800 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 4 core ARM Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller(up to 16 GB with 2133 MHz), a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the similar named Dimensity 800U, the 800 offers two more big A76 cores but clocked 400 MHz lower. This means the single core performance is lower, but the multi-core performance can be better.

The Dimensity 800 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

show full text
ModelMediaTek Dimensity 720MediaTek Dimensity 800
SeriesMediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8002 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 8002 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 7202 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
Features4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MC3, APU 3.0, 5G Modem, MiraVision (4K30 Video, 64MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 12GB LPDDR4x Support4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP3ARM Mali-G57 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 720

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 720
30.2 pt (51%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -65%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 -13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 -13%
Mediatek Helio G88 -9%
UNISOC T610 -9%
Mediatek Helio P70 -8%
Mediatek Helio G85 -5%
UNISOC Tangula T700 -3%
Mediatek Helio P90 -3%
Mediatek Helio G80 -3%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
Mediatek Helio G70 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 6%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G 10%
MediaTek Dimensity 700 13%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G 15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 15%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 94%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800
35.9 pt (61%)
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T -70%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G -8%
MediaTek Dimensity 700 -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G -3%
HiSilicon Kirin 810 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G -2%
Mediatek Helio G95 -2%
MediaTek Dimensity 800
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 0%
Mediatek Helio G90T 3%
MediaTek Dimensity 810 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G 4%
MediaTek Dimensity 800U 5%
Samsung Exynos 9820 7%
HiSilicon Kirin 980 10%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G 21%
HiSilicon Kirin 820 21%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G 64%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13664 Points (12%)
21499 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2901     avg: 3042     median: 3037 (38%)     max: 3189 Points
min: 3626     avg: 4027     median: 4026.5 (51%)     max: 4427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3014     avg: 3045     median: 3018 (44%)     max: 3102 Points
min: 3593     avg: 4024     median: 4024 (58%)     max: 4455 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2363 Points (27%)
2524 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6182 Points (8%)
8649 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 472     avg: 499.7     median: 511 (25%)     max: 516 Points
523 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1511     avg: 1592     median: 1627 (6%)     max: 1638 Points
2143 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2475     avg: 3334     median: 3467 (4%)     max: 4059 ms
3490 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 14156     avg: 15560     median: 14886 (15%)     max: 17637 Points
14751 Points (15%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 49     avg: 52.3     median: 51 (14%)     max: 57 Points
56 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 47476     avg: 52873     median: 52872.5 (44%)     max: 58269 Points
59479 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 42094     avg: 51085     median: 51084.5 (41%)     max: 60075 Points
49330 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 60295     avg: 63084     median: 63084 (12%)     max: 65873 Points
89187 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 84462     avg: 85620     median: 85619.5 (31%)     max: 86777 Points
99879 Points (36%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 252308     avg: 252661     median: 252660 (24%)     max: 253013 Points
297875 Points (29%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
176204 Points (23%)
23814 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
14932 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8694 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2711     avg: 2821     median: 2820.5 (15%)     max: 2930 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 13793     avg: 14162     median: 14161.5 (38%)     max: 14530 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6145     avg: 6770     median: 6770 (44%)     max: 7395 Points
min: 7511     avg: 7913     median: 7913 (52%)     max: 8315 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7158     avg: 8916     median: 8915.5 (45%)     max: 10673 Points
min: 9674     avg: 9817     median: 9816.5 (49%)     max: 9959 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.5 Watt (11%)
00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
0.9 Watt (3%)
00.10.10.20.20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.80.80.9111.11.1Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 720 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800 → 113% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 02:01:26

#0 checking url part for id 12994 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13001 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.038s ... 0.044s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.047s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.052s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 12994 +0.001s ... 0.053s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#20 got single benchmarks 12994 +0.009s ... 0.062s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.064s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 13001 +0s ... 0.066s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#33 got single benchmarks 13001 +0.007s ... 0.073s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.083s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.084s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.097s

#99 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.1s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s ... 0.128s

#101 return log +0.004s ... 0.132s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)