Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-14501E vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Intel Core i5-13500T

Intel Core i5-14501E

► remove from comparison Intel Core i5-14501E

The Intel Core i5-14501E is a peculiar Raptor Lake family desktop processor (SoC) that has 6 performance cores but 0 efficient cores. It's the lack of E-cores that makes 14X01 chips special.

The product has decently sized level 2 and 3 caches at 12 MB and 24 MB, respectively. Its CPU cores run at up to 5.2 GHz. The UHD 770 serves as the integrated graphics solution. There is no 'proper' NPU here, however, vPro Enterprise features such as RPE (Remote Platform Erase) are onboard.

The i5 chip is manufactured built with the Intel 7 process which is fairly old, as of mid 2025. Its base TDP sits at 65 W which is the standard value for desktop CPUs.

Performance

While we have not tested a single 14X01 processor as of July 2025, we do know that a single 4.6 GHz Raptor Cove core, such as that of an Core i7-14650HX is good for 116 Cinebench 2024 points and 285 Cinebench R15 points. (The 14501E can run at up to 5.2 GHz, too, to remind you.) If we multiply the values by 6, we get a reasonably fair projection that sees the 14501E being about as fast as lower mid-range laptop AMD chips of 2025, such as the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340. While not particularly impressive, this is definitely sufficient for any tasks and applications one could run in 2025, top games included.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7950X3D

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a high-end desktop processor of the Raphael series with 16 cores and SMT (Simultaneous Multithreading), which means it can process up to 32 threads simultaneously. With the release in February 2023, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is AMD's fastest consumer processor and the new top model of the 7000 series. The CPU cores clock from 4.2 GHz (base clock) up to 5.7 GHz (single core Turbo). In addition, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a CCD with 8 cores that can access the fast 3D V-cache, which offers considerably more gaming performance.

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is consistently excellent in all applications tested. In addition, AMD was again able to increase the single-thread performance compared to the non-X3D models. Nevertheless, the lower base clock compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X means that a small drop in multi-thread performance has to be accepted.

The internal structure of the processor is comparable to the previous AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is also still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters with 8 cores each. However, the two CCDs differ significantly from each other because one offers the fast 3D V-Cache, which primarily improves gaming performance. In testing, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D was able to put the Intel Core i9-13900K in second place and is the fastest gaming CPU on the market at the time of testing. 

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is an extremely energy-efficient CPU with up to 162 watts (PPT) and is significantly more frugal under load than an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (max. 230 watts).

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a fast and very economical desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.6 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model, and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited for small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-13500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 watts), the maximum possible energy requirement increases slightly.

ModelIntel Core i5-14501EAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DIntel Core i5-13500T
CodenameRaptor LakeRaphael (Zen4)Raptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)Intel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E « 3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D « 4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 79003.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 77003.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 76003.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5200 MHz4200 - 5700 MHz1600 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB16 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB128 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt120 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm5 nm10 nm
SocketLGA1700AM5 (LGA 1718)LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, DL Boost, GNA, vPro En., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache1 MB
Transistors13140 Million
Die Size263 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.89 °C100 °C
$699 U.S.
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7950X3D
49.9 pt (83%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
36291 Points (34%)
11028 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2053 Points (86%)
1754 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
795 Points (87%)
669 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
14188 Points (35%)
4246 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5974 Points (38%)
1945 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
326 Points (90%)
247 Points (68%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
64.6 Points (84%)
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.9 Points (92%)
3.1 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
16551 Points (100%)
8693 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
138015 Points (100%)
40528 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
72361 Points (46%)
62808 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8853 Points (11%)
14147 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
33.9 s (0%)
133.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2 s (0%)
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15779 Points (25%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
159341 MIPS (91%)
40034 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
8321 MIPS (98%)
5840 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
265.5 fps (89%)
100.5 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
392.5 fps (91%)
259.5 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
42.4 fps (75%)
12.1 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.2 GB/s (72%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.9 GB/s (70%)
8.2 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
133 Seconds (2%)
533 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
86 Seconds (1%)
291 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (8%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
20279 Points (43%)
12818 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.1 s (1%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
13.2 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
305.1 s (1%)
430.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
99321 Points (76%)
54029 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
36991 Points (91%)
12162 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
86389 Points (70%)
70975 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
86306 Points (70%)
69547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
87725 Points (73%)
77848 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
26168 Points (66%)
13665 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
44787 Points (80%)
18673 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
17206 Points (73%)
6210 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2990 Points (75%)
2393 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
19960 Points (77%)
7327 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2311 Points (90%)
1716 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
24343 Points (44%)
7377 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2183 Points (9%)
1685 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
23720 Points (75%)
7316 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9240 Points (92%)
7069 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
87922 Points (88%)
29164 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
437 ms (1%)
562 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
313 Points (86%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
383 Points (69%)
254 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2193 Points (82%)
1324 Points (50%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
276 Watt (48%)
55.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
273 Watt (50%)
79.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118.4 Watt (78%)
1377%
1 i5-13500T +
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 19. 18:56:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18709 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15000 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752944210s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:28:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18709 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 18709 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15000 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 15000 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#13 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.073s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.073s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)