Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is a higher-end Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 5.0 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 48 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 266V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestwood, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 268V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 48 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

The 268V should be just a couple of percentage points faster than the 258V for an Core Ultra 7 165U or Core i7-1360P-like multi-thread performance, provided it's running at the default long-term TDP power target which is 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 2,000 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 256V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 258V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestwood, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 256V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 256V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that both systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 30 W and 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 268VIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
CodenameLunar LakeLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V compare2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V compare2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 5000 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt37 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2833BGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (48 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 1950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 256V
38.3 pt (64%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 117.4     avg: 118.5     median: 118 (66%)     max: 120 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 435     avg: 549     median: 582 (11%)     max: 630 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10391     avg: 10580     median: 10579.5 (10%)     max: 10768 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1875     avg: 1889     median: 1888.5 (80%)     max: 1902 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 720     avg: 724     median: 723.5 (80%)     max: 727 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4038     avg: 4100     median: 4100 (10%)     max: 4162 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1570 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
285 Points (80%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 35950     avg: 35964     median: 35964 (21%)     max: 35978 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5616     avg: 5672     median: 5671.5 (67%)     max: 5727 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 13.1     avg: 13.3     median: 13.3 (23%)     max: 13.5 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 533     avg: 557     median: 556.5 (7%)     max: 580 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 324     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (2%)     max: 339 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4578     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4645 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14943     avg: 15150     median: 15149.5 (38%)     max: 15356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13988     avg: 14241     median: 14240.5 (36%)     max: 14493 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14488     avg: 19626     median: 22132 (39%)     max: 22257 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4853     avg: 6140     median: 6502 (27%)     max: 7066 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2583 Points (66%)
min: 2680     avg: 2747     median: 2778 (71%)     max: 2784 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10911 Points (42%)
min: 9852     avg: 10592     median: 10952 (43%)     max: 10972 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2008 Points (78%)
min: 1972     avg: 1991     median: 1991 (78%)     max: 2010 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9766 Points (17%)
min: 9302     avg: 9460     median: 9460 (17%)     max: 9618 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 472     avg: 473     median: 473 (1%)     max: 474 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 284     avg: 285     median: 285 (78%)     max: 286 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 306     avg: 308     median: 308 (55%)     max: 310 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1663     avg: 1700     median: 1699.5 (64%)     max: 1736 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.1     avg: 49.9     median: 49.9 (9%)     max: 53.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.9     avg: 54     median: 54 (10%)     max: 57.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 1.596     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (2%)     max: 3.63 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.954     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (4%)     max: 5.14 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
30.8 Points per Watt (23%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 268V → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 256V → 101% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 19. 08:17:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17991 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17996 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1737271035s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 05:19:03 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17991 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 17991 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17996 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 17996 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)