Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N5095 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U

Intel Celeron N5095

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. The Celeron was announced in early 2021. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz (base clock speed) Boosting up to 2.9 GHz (single-core Boost) with 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache but no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology. This processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen 10 nm process to be not unlike the Ice Lake-U Core-series processors. The faster Celeron N5105 is notable for being more energy efficient (10 W TDP vs N5095's 15 W) yet featuring a faster iGPU model (24 EU UHD Graphics versus 16 EU UHD Graphics, with a higher clock rate to boot).

Architecture

Tremont architecture brings many improvements over the outgoing Goldmont architecture we know from Pentium N5030 and so many other N-class CPUs. According to Intel, the new architecture brings a 30% boost in single thread performance (+10% to +80% in SPECint and SPECfp depending on the test).

While the older N-class Celerons and Pentiums had to be content with up to 8 GB of DDR4-2400 RAM, Celeron N5095 is officially compatible with up to 16 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2933 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-2933 memory. Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+) support is partially baked into the chip. The Celeron supports up to 8 PCI-Express 3.0 lanes, up to 14 USB 3.2 ports and up to two SATA III ports. Four PCI-Express 3.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 3.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Jasper Lake processor package is larger compared to what Gemini Lake models had (35 x 24 mm vs. 25 x 24 mm). Please note that the Celeron gets soldered on to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average N5095 in our database matches the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Even if the cooling system is great and the Power Limits are high as the sky, some slight architectural improvements together with the updated manufacturing node and higher-than-usual wattage of the Celeron are not nearly enough to let it compete with modern Core and Ryzen-series processors. It's a good option for basic day-to-day tasks, but anything beyond that will be a struggle.

Graphics

The CPU features the DirectX 12-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics iGPU running at 450 MHz to 750 MHz. The graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 displays with resolutions up to 4096x2160@60; it will happily decode HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs. The latest AV1 codec is not supported, though. (You can still play such a video but it will be software-decoded rather than hardware-decoded which puts a hard limit on the watchable resolution as the CPU cores are not very fast here.)

This is not a gaming GPU by any stretch of imagination. It is just as fast as an HD Graphics 515; it will let you play the least demanding titles (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided you are OK with 720p resolution and lowest quality preset possible.

Power consumption

Most N-class Celerons and Pentiums have a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit). The Celeron N5095 on the other hand has a 15 Watt TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core i3/i5/i7 processors. This basically means that passively cooled designs are out of the question with this chip.

This Intel processor is manufactured on Intel's first-gen or second-gen 10 nm process [no precise data available] for OK, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200U is a mobile APU for thin and light laptops that was announced in Early 2018. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 3 2200U, the PRO versions offer additional security features. It includes two Zen cores clocked at 2.5 to 3.4 GHz and offers SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal).

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelIntel Celeron N5095AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameJasper LakeZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA1338AM4
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache192 KB
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N5095
21.6 pt (30%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2150     avg: 2174     median: 2164 (2%)     max: 2219 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 587     avg: 608     median: 611 (26%)     max: 621 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 228     avg: 234     median: 234 (26%)     max: 239 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 804     avg: 825     median: 827 (2%)     max: 844 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 221     avg: 343     median: 364 (2%)     max: 379 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 95.4     avg: 103.9     median: 106 (32%)     max: 109 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.65     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (6%)     max: 4.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.25     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (32%)     max: 1.29 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3527     avg: 3545     median: 3544.5 (21%)     max: 3562 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 12218     avg: 12283     median: 12283 (9%)     max: 12348 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 16442     avg: 16860     median: 16860 (12%)     max: 17278 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5224     avg: 5338     median: 5337.5 (7%)     max: 5451 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 605.375     avg: 611     median: 611.4 (7%)     max: 617.326 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 19.202     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.779 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1630     avg: 1706     median: 1705.5 (3%)     max: 1781 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10924     avg: 11024     median: 11013 (6%)     max: 11168 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2935     avg: 3074     median: 3100 (37%)     max: 3124 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 24.75     avg: 25     median: 25 (9%)     max: 25.25 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 112.75     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (27%)     max: 120.25 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.9     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.5 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2936 Seconds (37%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1502     avg: 1548     median: 1547 (11%)     max: 1624 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.16     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (25%)     max: 1.2 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5266     avg: 5272     median: 5272 (11%)     max: 5278 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1039 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4224     avg: 4309     median: 4287 (12%)     max: 4439 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 41689     avg: 42092     median: 42091.5 (34%)     max: 42494 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 41654     avg: 42066     median: 42065.5 (34%)     max: 42477 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 46730     avg: 47458     median: 47458 (40%)     max: 48186 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3720     avg: 3823     median: 3846 (10%)     max: 3888 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5400     avg: 5496     median: 5499 (10%)     max: 5572 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1595     avg: 1649     median: 1656 (7%)     max: 1696 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 637     avg: 649     median: 650.5 (27%)     max: 659 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1933     avg: 2010     median: 2028 (4%)     max: 2052 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 644     median: 646.5 (3%)     max: 655 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1985     avg: 2029     median: 2030.5 (6%)     max: 2070 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2896     median: 2900 (29%)     max: 2929 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7759     avg: 7856     median: 7842 (9%)     max: 7968 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1557     avg: 1578     median: 1571.5 (2%)     max: 1619 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 94.2     avg: 95.2     median: 95.2 (27%)     max: 96.2 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 114.3     avg: 123.4     median: 125.3 (26%)     max: 127.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 473     avg: 486     median: 490 (19%)     max: 495 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 24.4     median: 24.4 (4%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.7     avg: 22     median: 22.1 (4%)     max: 23 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.6     avg: 17     median: 17.2 (13%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5095 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 06:49:33

#0 checking url part for id 13189 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10134 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1720846172 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Jul 2024 05:16:13 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13189 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 13189 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10134 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 10134 +0s ... 0.02s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.046s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)