Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Pentium Silver N6005

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a fairly slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities.

You mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is not much at all and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

The Celeron N4500 is built with Intel's 2nd generation 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Pentium Silver N6005

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N6005

The Intel Pentium Silver N6005 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive and small desktop and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 2 and 3.3 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N6005 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

CPU Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 32 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 450 - 900 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0 / 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N6005 in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1110G4, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is enough to enjoy Web browsing and watch videos online without noticeable slowdowns, as of mid 2023 - which is what most consumers want.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 15 W, the Intel NUC11ATKPE is among the fastest systems built around the N6005 that we know of. It can be about 50% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 10 Watts (versus the 6 W of the mobile N6000). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Pentium Silver N6005
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameJasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 « 2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz2000 - 3300 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt10 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1338BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) (450 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
17.2 pt (24%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N6005
22.7 pt (31%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
min: 1525     avg: 1944     median: 1833 (2%)     max: 2475 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (19%)
min: 624     avg: 671     median: 694 (30%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (21%)
min: 239     avg: 255.7     median: 262 (29%)     max: 266 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
min: 584     avg: 751     median: 720 (2%)     max: 948 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (1%)
min: 267     avg: 338     median: 319 (2%)     max: 428 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (25%)
min: 107     avg: 117     median: 121 (36%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
min: 4.14     avg: 4.9     median: 4.9 (6%)     max: 5.56 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (26%)
min: 1.47     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (37%)     max: 1.48 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3776     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (24%)     max: 4164 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 10619     avg: 12496     median: 12496 (9%)     max: 14373 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
min: 15504     avg: 17871     median: 17871 (12%)     max: 20238 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (6%)
min: 6163     avg: 6168     median: 6167.5 (8%)     max: 6172 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
min: 493.256     avg: 554     median: 554.1 (7%)     max: 615 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
min: 16.004     avg: 16.6     median: 16.5 (3%)     max: 17.09 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (2%)
min: 1525     avg: 1675     median: 1674.5 (3%)     max: 1824 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
min: 9367     avg: 10727     median: 9964 (6%)     max: 12851 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
min: 3425     avg: 3468     median: 3465 (41%)     max: 3515 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
min: 21.6     avg: 25.2     median: 25.2 (9%)     max: 28.75 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
min: 102     avg: 118.8     median: 118.8 (27%)     max: 135.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
min: 1.65     avg: 1.9     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 2.34 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.219     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.23 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (7%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
2464 Seconds (31%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
min: 1354     avg: 1730     median: 1805 (13%)     max: 2032 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
min: 1.073     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (25%)     max: 1.171 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
min: 4881     avg: 5451     median: 5451 (12%)     max: 6021 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
min: 17.564     avg: 17.6     median: 17.6 (4%)     max: 17.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
min: 39.14     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (2%)     max: 39.333 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
min: 866     avg: 881     median: 880.6 (4%)     max: 895.292 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10338     avg: 12077     median: 12076.5 (11%)     max: 13815 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
min: 3659     avg: 4342     median: 4341.5 (12%)     max: 5024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 25277     avg: 36490     median: 36489.5 (30%)     max: 47702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 27534     avg: 37546     median: 37545.5 (30%)     max: 47557 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 37549     avg: 46388     median: 46388 (39%)     max: 55227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
min: 2945     avg: 3737     median: 3737 (9%)     max: 4529 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
min: 4295     avg: 5349     median: 5349 (10%)     max: 6403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
1956 Points (8%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
457 Points (14%)
578 Points (18%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
662 Points (3%)
1332 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 531     median: 594 (25%)     max: 598 Points
min: 606     avg: 680     median: 695 (29%)     max: 738 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 929     median: 1018 (2%)     max: 1063 Points
min: 1578     avg: 1884     median: 1673 (3%)     max: 2402 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 603     avg: 659     median: 680 (3%)     max: 694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1313     avg: 1768     median: 1537 (5%)     max: 2455 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2555     avg: 2878     median: 2764 (28%)     max: 3314 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5097     avg: 6641     median: 5399 (6%)     max: 9426 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1665.2     avg: 2413     median: 2412.6 (3%)     max: 3160 ms
min: 1396     avg: 1443     median: 1417 (2%)     max: 1516 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
197.1 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
24838 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
91.2 Points (26%)
104.2 Points (30%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 48.2     avg: 94.8     median: 94.8 (20%)     max: 141.3 Points
min: 142.3     avg: 145.1     median: 146 (30%)     max: 147 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
6833 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7404 Points (34%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
539 Points (21%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
81 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
min: 18.9     avg: 23     median: 23 (4%)     max: 27 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (4%)     max: 25.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
10.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.34     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (5%)     max: 8.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
17.7 Points per Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N6005 → 181% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 20:45:52

#0 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13109 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.018s ... 0.04s

#7 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.025s ... 0.066s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13109 +0.018s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 13109 +0.013s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.321s ... 0.417s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.456s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)