Intel Celeron J4105 vs Intel Celeron N4120

Intel Celeron J4105

► remove Intel Celeron J4105

The Intel Celeron J4105 is a quad-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 1.5 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron N4120 is slightly higher than the older N4100 thanks to the 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Compared to the more expensive Core Y processors, especially the single thread performance is much lower in the Gemini Lake based SoCs. Still for basic tasks like office suits, browsing with moderate multitasking the processor performance should be fine.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Similar to the predecessor, Intel specifies the TDP with 6 Watts (SDP 4.8 Watts – Scenario Design Power). The chip can therefore be cooled passively in theory, but SKUs with fans are possible as well.

Intel Celeron J4105Intel Celeron N4120
Intel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
Gemini LakeGemini Lake
: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
» Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare2 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare2 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron J4005 compare2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2
1500 - 2500 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
4 MB4 MB
4 / 44 / 4
10 6
14 14
105 °C
FCBGA1090FCBGA1090
Intel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400Intel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Intel Gemini Lake Celeron J4105

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
270 Points (6%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (27%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1915 (26%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5477 (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)