Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4105 vs Intel Celeron J4005

Intel Celeron J4105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4105

The Intel Celeron J4105 is a quad-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 1.5 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Intel Celeron J4005

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron J4005 is a dual-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 2 - 2.7 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

ModelIntel Celeron J4105Intel Celeron J4005
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini LakeGemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J4105 « 1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 compare1.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4005 « 2 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4100 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1500 - 2500 MHz2000 - 2700 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 42 / 2
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA (1090)
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, EM64T, AES, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Gemini Lake Celeron J4105Intel Gemini Lake Celeron J4005
L1 Cache112 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
270 Points (3%)
144 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (22%)
77 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.4 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2085 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3500 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4741 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3365 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1042 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
33.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
798 Points (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
49.9 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.9 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4124 Seconds (29%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1245 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1877 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18895 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
18968 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19351 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1577 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2241 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1997 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3491 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4005 → 79% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 27. 08:53:00

#0 checking url part for id 9928 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10044 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9928 +0.002s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 9928 +0.005s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10044 +0.002s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 10044 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.08s ... 0.107s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.128s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)