Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Pentium Silver J5040

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

Intel Pentium Silver J5040

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium J5040

The Intel Pentium Silver J5040 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive mini-PCs and was announced late 2019. It runs at 2 GHz (base) to 3.2 GHz (single core burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform (refresh). Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clock speed and TDP, the Pentium J5040 is slightly faster than the mobile counterpart, the Pentium Silver N5030. Compare to AMD, it ranks on average slightly higher compared to the Athlon Silver 3050e (Zen based Dual-Core) that wins in single-core tests but looses out in multi-threaded tests. Intel Core i3 from 2019 (like the i3-1005G1) are clearly faster and win even in multi-threaded tests easily although being only dual-core CPUs.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 800 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The J-variant of the Gemini Lake SoCs are specified at 10W TDP and therefore higher than the mobile N variants (6 Watt).

ModelIntel Celeron J4025Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Silver J50402 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 « 2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz2000 - 3200 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090FCBGA1090
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400Intel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
1634 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
519 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
178 Points (20%)
202 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
293 Points (1%)
630 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
148 Points (1%)
279 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
91 Points (27%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.8 Points (2%)
3.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
1.1 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2337 Points (14%)
2688 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4556 Points (3%)
8279 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
13248 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
4422 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
983 s (12%)
516 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.1 s (6%)
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
783 Points (1%)
1391 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4955 MIPS (3%)
8946 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2636 MIPS (32%)
2833 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.6 fps (4%)
19.2 fps (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.1 fps (12%)
89.1 fps (21%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1 fps (2%)
1.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
2 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3792 Seconds (27%)
2060 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (31%)
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2575 Points (5%)
4296 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
23.1 s (5%)
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.9 s (2%)
47.8 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1176 s (5%)
1083 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4284 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41689 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41654 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3720 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5474 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
500 Points (21%)
538 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
927 Points (2%)
1672 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
535 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
1664 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
2333 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
6359 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2151 ms (3%)
1957 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
80.2 Points (23%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89.2 Points (19%)
108.2 Points (23%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)
426 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5040 → 144% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 07:21:51

#0 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14651 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.023s ... 0.069s

#7 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.013s ... 0.082s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14651 +0.004s ... 0.085s

#9 got single benchmarks 14651 +0.011s ... 0.097s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.368s ... 0.464s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.502s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)