Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4025 vs Intel Celeron N4120

Intel Celeron J4025

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4025

The Intel Celeron J4025 is an energy-efficient, dual-core processor (SoC) of the Gemini Lake Refresh product family; as such, it is designed for use in mini-PCs of the most affordable flavor. The Celeron was launched in Q4 2019. Its CPU cores run at 2 GHz to 2.9 GHz (single core boost). Other key specs include a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (up to 2,400 MHz and up to 8 GB, with independent reports claiming as much as 32 GB will work just fine) and the integrated UHD Graphics 600 graphics adapter.

Architecture

Just like Apollo Lake family products, the ever-popular N3350 included, Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel on a 14 nm process. What makes these newer Celerons different are the slightly improved processor cores with double the L2 cache and also, somewhat counterintuitively, their smaller chip area.

The Goldmont Plus microarchitecture is familiar to us from Gemini Lake processors like the N4000. A moderately large 4 MB L2 cache features prominently on the rather short list of Goldmont Plus' strong sides, allowing for a marginal increase in performance-per-MHz figures compared to Goldmont. Still, Gemini Lake Refresh processors are a clear step-down from the Core i3/i5/i7/i9 series processors, both in performance and in features.

J4025 has six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes at its disposal. While very few J4025-based SBCs, nettops and laptops feature an NVMe M.2 slot, you can use an NVMe SSD as a boot drive with this processor (read/write rates will be limited to 2 GB/s though). Furthermore, partial Wi-Fi 5 support is built into the CPU. The Celeron also supports up to eight USB 3.0 ports and two SATA III storage devices.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. They solder it straight on to the motherboard for good (FCBGA1090 socket interface).

Performance

The Celeron J4025 is positioned in the lower entry level and only slightly faster than the mobile Celeron N4020. Therefore, it is best suited for basic tasks like word processing and web browsing with just two or three tabs open.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, much like HD Graphics 520 or UHD Graphics 615 or so many other widespread Intel iGPUs.

Just like HD Graphics 500, the UHD Graphics 600 supports DX 12 and has 12 EUs clocked at up to 650 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 iGPU that certain 10th Gen Ice Lake processors have packs 64 EUs, for reference. As a low-end solution, UHD Graphics 600 will let you play some seriously old titles, but that's about it.

Perhaps more importantly, this graphics solution will let you run up to 3 monitors with resolutions as high as 4096x2160@60. Furthermore, it will have no trouble HW-decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9 videos. The newer AV1 codec will be decoded via software, with the limited CPU horsepower imposing a hard limit on the video resolution that can be played back without stuttering. 1080p60 YouTube videos are out of reach while 720p25 videos run fine, to give you an example.

Power Consumption

As a J-series CPU, the TDP is rated at 10 Watts and therefore 4 W higher than the mobile N4020. 

Intel Celeron N4120

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4120

The Intel Celeron N4120 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Compared to the predecessor, the Celeron N4100, the refresh offers a 200 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessors, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture ist still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4120 in our database is not much faster than AMD's Zen-based, affordable Athlon Silver 3050e, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the Intel Celeron 6305 and the Core i5-7Y54 found close nearby as well. It's a very basic CPU that we're talking about here. While it does have four cores, these are some seriously slow cores, dashing hopes of anybody looking to get a Core i3-like performance for cheap.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 700 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, Celeron N4120 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as PL1), making it a good option for passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs. It's manufactured on a very old (as of late 2022) 14 nm process, though, making for poor energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4025Intel Celeron N4120
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Gemini Lake
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshGemini Lake Refresh
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake Refresh
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41201.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 « 2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40252 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 - 2900 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1090
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 600 (12 EUs, 250 - 700 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron J4025
16.9 pt (23%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4120
17.4 pt (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
857 Points (1%)
min: 965     avg: 1149     median: 1230 (1%)     max: 1253 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
461 Points (20%)
min: 409     avg: 416.5     median: 416.5 (18%)     max: 424 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
178 Points (20%)
min: 159     avg: 163.3     median: 165 (18%)     max: 166 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
293 Points (1%)
min: 376     avg: 460.7     median: 490 (1%)     max: 516 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
148 Points (1%)
min: 223     avg: 227     median: 224 (1%)     max: 234 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
77 Points (23%)
min: 73     avg: 73.6     median: 73.2 (22%)     max: 74.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.8 Points (2%)
2.7 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
0.9 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2337 Points (14%)
2159 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4556 Points (3%)
6432 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7049 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3920 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
983 s (12%)
661 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
31.1 s (6%)
17.6 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
783 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
4955 MIPS (3%)
min: 5832     avg: 6817     median: 7184 (4%)     max: 7436 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2636 MIPS (32%)
min: 2145     avg: 2279     median: 2279 (27%)     max: 2412 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
53.1 fps (12%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1 fps (2%)
min: 1.02     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.38 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (3%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
7396 Seconds (94%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
3792 Seconds (27%)
min: 2558     avg: 2571     median: 2570.5 (18%)     max: 2583 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (31%)
min: 1.642     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (36%)     max: 1.649 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2575 Points (5%)
3403 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
23.1 s (5%)
25.6 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.9 s (2%)
58.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1176 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4284 Points (12%)
min: 2626     avg: 2669     median: 2668.5 (7%)     max: 2711 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41689 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41654 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
46730 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3720 Points (9%)
min: 2251     avg: 2348     median: 2373 (6%)     max: 2421 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5474 Points (10%)
min: 3496     avg: 3723     median: 3688 (7%)     max: 3984 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 909     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (4%)     max: 968 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
500 Points (21%)
min: 438     avg: 442     median: 439 (19%)     max: 449 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
927 Points (2%)
min: 1505     avg: 1525     median: 1509 (3%)     max: 1561 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
497 Points (2%)
min: 435     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (2%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
919 Points (3%)
min: 1492     avg: 1503     median: 1503 (5%)     max: 1514 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2170 Points (22%)
min: 1864     avg: 1885     median: 1876 (19%)     max: 1915 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3847 Points (4%)
min: 5477     avg: 5606     median: 5668 (6%)     max: 5674 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2151 ms (3%)
min: 2125     avg: 2308     median: 2345.5 (3%)     max: 2415 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
520 ms (6%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16865     avg: 17701     median: 17701 (16%)     max: 18537 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
67.1 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
89.2 Points (19%)
min: 85     avg: 90.9     median: 86.2 (18%)     max: 106 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 3.0 Battery Life
383 min (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
28061 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
8969 Points (41%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
362 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.2 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.3 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
28.4 Points per Watt (21%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4025 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4120 → 117% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 05:47:02

#0 checking url part for id 14663 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11533 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14663 +0.025s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 14663 +0.012s ... 0.079s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11533 +0.018s ... 0.096s

#9 got single benchmarks 11533 +0.031s ... 0.127s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.386s ... 0.513s

#12 return log +0.034s ... 0.546s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)