, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Celeron 6205

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron 6305 (or 6305U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads as no HyperThreading/SMT). The clock speed is set at 1.8 GHz as the chip does not support Turbo Boost. Thanks to the architectural improvements of the CPU cores, the Celeron 6305 should still be faster than the old Comet Lake-U based Celeron 5205U (1.9 GHz, no Turbo).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake). In the 6305U Intel calls it just UHD Graphics and it offers 48 EUs.

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm+ process (called 10 nm SuperFin) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Intel Celeron 6205

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6205

The Intel Celeron 6205 (or 6205U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that should be announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates most likely only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads as no HyperThreading/SMT). The clock speed is not yet known but should be similar to the Comet Lake-U based Celeron 5205U (1.9 GHz, no Turbo).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake).

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm+ process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Beware, the information above is still based on rumors, leaks and first informations (e.g., thisTiger Lake LeakNUC 11,) and can change till the CPU is released. All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Celeron 6305Intel Celeron 6205
Intel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Tiger Lake UTiger Lake U
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake U
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
Intel Celeron 62052 / 24 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 63051.8 GHz2 / 24 MB
» Intel Celeron 62052 / 24 MB
1800 MHz
160 KB160 KB
2.5 MB2.5 MB
4 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
15 15
10 10
BGA1499BGA1499
Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Tiger Lake Celeron 6305

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 13:53:11

#0 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12246 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0s ... 0.01s

#7 got single benchmarks 12244 +0s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12246 +0s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 12246 +0s ... 0.011s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.011s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)