Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 6205 vs Intel Celeron 6305

Intel Celeron 6205

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6205

The Intel Celeron 6205 (or 6205U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that should be announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates most likely only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads as no HyperThreading/SMT). The clock speed is not yet known but should be similar to the Comet Lake-U based Celeron 5205U (1.9 GHz, no Turbo).

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics card based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake).

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm+ process at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Beware, the information above is still based on rumors, leaks and first informations (e.g., thisTiger Lake LeakNUC 11,) and can change till the CPU is released. All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron 6305 (or 6305U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads - no Hyper-Threading/SMT). The clock speed is set at 1.8 GHz as the chip does not support Turbo Boost.

Performance

The average 6305 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N4505, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very poor result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics фвфзеук based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake). In the 6305U Intel calls it just UHD Graphics and it offers 48 EUs.

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm+ process (called 10 nm SuperFin) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

ModelIntel Celeron 6205Intel Celeron 6305
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameTiger Lake UTiger Lake-U
L1 Cache160 KB160 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1499BGA1449
FeaturesWi-Fi 6 (Gig+), Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-3733DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-U
Intel Celeron 6305 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock1800 MHz
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron 6305
17.8 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1056     avg: 1072     median: 1071.5 (1%)     max: 1087 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 566     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (24%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
217 Points (24%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
416 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 160.8     avg: 161.1     median: 161.1 (1%)     max: 161.3 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 82.6     avg: 84     median: 84 (25%)     max: 85.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3465 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6611 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1231 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1210 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 4226     avg: 4263     median: 4262.5 (2%)     max: 4299 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2233     avg: 2238     median: 2237.5 (27%)     max: 2242 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
61.9 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2824     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (20%)     max: 2844 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
905 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1723     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (5%)     max: 2148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19614     avg: 19990     median: 19990 (17%)     max: 20366 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1619     avg: 1639     median: 1638.5 (4%)     max: 1658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2368     avg: 2391     median: 2390.5 (4%)     max: 2413 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 632     avg: 638     median: 638 (27%)     max: 644 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1198     median: 1198 (2%)     max: 1242 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 626     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (3%)     max: 631 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1151     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (4%)     max: 1216 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2776     avg: 2825     median: 2824.5 (28%)     max: 2873 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4762     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (6%)     max: 5137 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1678     avg: 1681     median: 1681 (2%)     max: 1684 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
326.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
21416 Points (19%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 99.2     avg: 100.7     median: 100.7 (21%)     max: 102.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 501     avg: 508     median: 507.5 (19%)     max: 514 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.8 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.6 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
15.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 6305 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 28. 18:31:12

#0 checking url part for id 12246 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12246 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#7 got single benchmarks 12246 +0s ... 0.025s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0.016s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 12244 +0.009s ... 0.051s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.164s

#12 return log +0.02s ... 0.184s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)