AMD C-50 vs AMD C-60

AMD C-50

► remove

The AMD C-50 (codename Ontario) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3(L)-1066 memory controller. The successor, the C-60 offers the same base clock speed but in addition a short Turbo Core overclocking to 1.33 GHz.

Inside the C-50 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6250 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6250 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The processor speed is somewhere between a single core 1.6 GHz Atom N455 and a dual core Atom N550 depending on the benchmark (see below). Therefore, the performance is still in netbook regions and only suited for low demanding tasks.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 9 Watt by AMD and therefore a bit higher as the single core Atom CPUs at 1.6 GHz.

AMD C-60

► remove

The AMD C-60 (codename Ontario) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3(L)-1066 memory controller. Compared to the C-50, the C-60 offers the same base clock speed but in addition a short Turbo Core overclocking to 1.33 GHz. 

Inside the C-60 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. 

The integrated AMD Radeon HD 6290 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6290 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Compared to the HD 6250 in the C-50, the 6290 also offers Turbo Core to overclock to up to 400MHz (same 276MHz base speed).

The processor speed is somewhere between a single core 1.6 GHz Atom N455 and a dual core Atom N550 depending on the benchmark (see below). Therefore, the performance is still in netbook regions and only suited for low demanding tasks.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 9 Watt by AMD and therefore a bit higher as the single core Atom CPUs at 1.6 GHz.

AMD C-50AMD C-60
AMD C-SeriesAMD C-Series
OntarioOntario
: C-Series Ontario
AMD C-70 (compare)1000 - 1333 MHz2 / 2
AMD C-601000 - 1333 MHz2 / 2
» AMD C-501000 MHz2 / 2
AMD C-30 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
AMD C-70 (compare)1000 - 1333 MHz2 / 2
» AMD C-601000 - 1333 MHz2 / 2
AMD C-501000 MHz2 / 2
AMD C-30 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
1000 MHz1000 - 1333 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
9 9
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400MHz)
AMD C-Series C-50AMD C-Series C-60

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
C-50 +
min: 0.3     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.39 Points
114%
C-60 +
min: 0.42     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (2%)     max: 0.45 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
C-60 +
0.2 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
C-50 +
min: 622     avg: 655.3     median: 661 (7%)     max: 695 Points
116%
C-60 +
min: 756     avg: 769     median: 767.5 (8%)     max: 785 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
C-50 +
min: 1172     avg: 1279.1     median: 1281.5 (3%)     max: 1405 Points
116%
C-60 +
min: 1344     avg: 1458     median: 1483 (3%)     max: 1522 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
C-50 +
min: 1294     avg: 1369.3     median: 1389 (2%)     max: 1405 Points
108%
C-60 +
min: 1388     avg: 1504.5     median: 1504.5 (2%)     max: 1621 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
C-50 +
min: 681     avg: 712.5     median: 716 (7%)     max: 737 Points
113%
C-60 +
min: 758     avg: 812.5     median: 812.5 (8%)     max: 867 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
100%
C-50 +
min: 3268.5     avg: 3646.4     median: 3594 (42%)     max: 4454 seconds
118%
C-60 +
min: 2685     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (32%)     max: 2767 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
100%
C-50 +
min: 103.2     avg: 115     median: 111.2 (22%)     max: 141 seconds
106%
C-60 +
min: 84.5     avg: 86.2     median: 86.2 (17%)     max: 87.8 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
C-50 +
min: 512     avg: 616.3     median: 635.5 (4%)     max: 658 Points
118%
C-60 +
min: 633     avg: 727.3     median: 753 (5%)     max: 770 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
C-50 +
min: 17     avg: 71     median: 76 (16%)     max: 94 Seconds
102%
C-60 +
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (15%)     max: 69 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
C-50 +
min: 166.546     avg: 183.1     median: 171 (7%)     max: 229 Seconds
101%
C-60 +
min: 143.1     avg: 148.1     median: 148.1 (6%)     max: 153 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
C-50 +
min: 3671     avg: 4357.1     median: 3776 (17%)     max: 7263.76 Seconds
103%
C-60 +
3140 Seconds (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
C-50 +
min: 4000     avg: 5353.2     median: 5321.5 (3%)     max: 6239 MIPS
110%
C-60 +
min: 5840     avg: 6200     median: 5870 (3%)     max: 6890 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
C-50 +
min: 3710     avg: 4991.3     median: 5185 (4%)     max: 5550 MFLOPS
129%
C-60 +
min: 5660     avg: 6350     median: 6680 (5%)     max: 6710 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
C-50 +
min: 2.7     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (36%)     max: 2.8 points
116%
C-60 +
min: 3.1     avg: 3.7     median: 3.3 (42%)     max: 5.2 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
C-50 +
min: 955     avg: 1176     median: 1213.5 (2%)     max: 1246 Points
102%
C-60 +
min: 1220     avg: 1240.5     median: 1240.5 (2%)     max: 1261 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
C-50 +
min: 168     avg: 350     median: 374 (2%)     max: 455 points
144%
C-60 +
538 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD C-50 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD C-60 → 113%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)