Notebookcheck Logo

AMD C-30 vs AMD C-60 vs AMD C-50

AMD C-30

► remove from comparison

The AMD C-30 (codename Ontario) is a single-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Compared to the faster C-50, the C-30 has only one activated processor core but is on the other hand a bit faster clocked.

Inside the C-30 one Bobcat core can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron single core) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. Compared to Intel Atom processors, the calculating power is somewhere between a 1.3 - 1.6 GHz clocked single core Atom (e.g. Z520 - Z530 in 3DMark06 CPU test) processor. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6250 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6250 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Due to the slow processor part, most games still are not playable. The main advantage however is the possibility to fluently play back most HD videos using the UVD3 core.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 9 Watt by AMD and therefore a bit higher as the single core Atom CPUs at 1.6 GHz.

AMD C-60

► remove from comparison

The AMD C-60 (codename Ontario) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3(L)-1066 memory controller. Compared to the C-50, the C-60 offers the same base clock speed but in addition a short Turbo Core overclocking to 1.33 GHz. 

Inside the C-60 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. 

The integrated AMD Radeon HD 6290 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6290 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Compared to the HD 6250 in the C-50, the 6290 also offers Turbo Core to overclock to up to 400MHz (same 276MHz base speed).

The processor speed is somewhere between a single core 1.6 GHz Atom N455 and a dual core Atom N550 depending on the benchmark (see below). Therefore, the performance is still in netbook regions and only suited for low demanding tasks.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 9 Watt by AMD and therefore a bit higher as the single core Atom CPUs at 1.6 GHz.

AMD C-50

► remove from comparison

The AMD C-50 (codename Ontario) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3(L)-1066 memory controller. The successor, the C-60 offers the same base clock speed but in addition a short Turbo Core overclocking to 1.33 GHz.

Inside the C-50 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6250 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6250 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The processor speed is somewhere between a single core 1.6 GHz Atom N455 and a dual core Atom N550 depending on the benchmark (see below). Therefore, the performance is still in netbook regions and only suited for low demanding tasks.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 9 Watt by AMD and therefore a bit higher as the single core Atom CPUs at 1.6 GHz.

ModelAMD C-30AMD C-60AMD C-50
SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD C-SeriesAMD C-Series
CodenameOntarioOntarioOntario
Series: C-Series Ontario
AMD C-701 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-601 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-501 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-30 « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD C-701 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-60 « 1 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-501 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-301.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD C-701 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-601 - 1.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-50 « 1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD C-301.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1200 MHz1000 - 1333 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 22 / 2
TDP9 Watt9 Watt9 Watt
Technology40 nm, 1.24-1.35V40 nm40 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Single-Channel DDR3(L) Memory ControllerMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400MHz)MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 0.42     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.45 Points
87%
1 C-50 +
min: 0.3     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 C-60 +
0.2 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 756     avg: 769     median: 767.5 (5%)     max: 785 Points
86%
1 C-50 +
min: 622     avg: 655     median: 661 (4%)     max: 695 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 1344     avg: 1458     median: 1483 (1%)     max: 1522 Points
86%
1 C-50 +
min: 1172     avg: 1279     median: 1281.5 (1%)     max: 1405 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 1388     avg: 1505     median: 1504.5 (1%)     max: 1621 Points
92%
1 C-50 +
min: 1294     avg: 1369     median: 1389 (1%)     max: 1405 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 758     avg: 813     median: 812.5 (1%)     max: 867 Points
88%
1 C-50 +
min: 681     avg: 713     median: 716 (1%)     max: 737 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 2685     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (32%)     max: 2767 s
85%
1 C-50 +
min: 3269     avg: 3646     median: 3594 (42%)     max: 4454 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 84.5     avg: 86.2     median: 86.2 (17%)     max: 87.8 s
94%
1 C-50 +
min: 103.2     avg: 115     median: 111.2 (22%)     max: 141 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
C-30 +
403 Points (1%)
187%
C-60 +
min: 633     avg: 727     median: 753 (2%)     max: 770 Points
158%
C-50 +
min: 512     avg: 616     median: 635.5 (1%)     max: 658 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 68     avg: 68.5     median: 68.5 (15%)     max: 69 s
98%
1 C-50 +
min: 17     avg: 71     median: 76 (16%)     max: 94 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 143.1     avg: 148.1     median: 148.1 (6%)     max: 153 s
99%
1 C-50 +
min: 166.5     avg: 183.1     median: 171 (7%)     max: 229 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 C-60 +
3140 s (14%)
97%
1 C-50 +
min: 3671     avg: 4357     median: 3776 (17%)     max: 7264 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 5840     avg: 6200     median: 5870 (3%)     max: 6890 MIPS
91%
1 C-50 +
min: 4000     avg: 5353     median: 5321.5 (3%)     max: 6239 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 5660     avg: 6350     median: 6680 (5%)     max: 6710 MFLOPS
78%
1 C-50 +
min: 3710     avg: 4991     median: 5185 (4%)     max: 5550 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
C-30 +
1.9 Points (24%)
171%
C-60 +
min: 3.1     avg: 3.7     median: 3.3 (42%)     max: 5.2 Points
147%
C-50 +
min: 2.7     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (36%)     max: 2.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 C-60 +
min: 1220     avg: 1241     median: 1240.5 (1%)     max: 1261 Points
98%
1 C-50 +
min: 955     avg: 1176     median: 1213.5 (1%)     max: 1246 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 C-60 +
538 Points (1%)
70%
1 C-50 +
min: 168     avg: 350     median: 374 (1%)     max: 455 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD C-30 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD C-60 → 179% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD C-50 → 153% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 22:00:08

#0 checking url part for id 1515 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2362 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1513 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1515 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#8 got single benchmarks 1515 +0.009s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2362 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 2362 +0.021s ... 0.058s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1513 +0.004s ... 0.061s

#12 got single benchmarks 1513 +0.028s ... 0.089s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.12s ... 0.209s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.209s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)