Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium B970 vs Intel Pentium B960

Intel Pentium B970

► remove from comparison Intel B970

The Intel Pentium B970 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B970 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1100 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B970 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. Therefore, the B960 should perform about 10% better than a Pentium P6300.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and DDR3-1333 memory controller.

Intel Pentium B960

► remove from comparison Intel B960

The Intel Pentium B960 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B960 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1100 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B960 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. Therefore, the B960 should perform similar to the Core i3-330M with 2.13 GHz, HyperThreading and 3MB Cache.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and DDR3-1333 memory controller.

ModelIntel Pentium B970Intel Pentium B960
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Pentium
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Pentium Sandy Bridge
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B970 « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9602.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B940 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 967 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B980 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B960 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B950 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B940 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 997 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 987 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 977 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 967 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 957 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2300 MHz2200 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million624 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size149 mm2149 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C85 °C
SocketrPGA988BrPGA988B
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory ControllerHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$125 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.66     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.78 Points
min: 1.45     avg: 1.6     median: 1.7 (2%)     max: 1.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2881     avg: 2943.3     median: 2954 (18%)     max: 2995 Points
min: 2759     avg: 2838.2     median: 2851 (17%)     max: 2869 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5665     avg: 5726     median: 5697 (4%)     max: 5816 Points
min: 5019     avg: 5416.6     median: 5500 (4%)     max: 5550 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 6721     avg: 6925.3     median: 6989 (5%)     max: 7066 Points
min: 6083     avg: 6647.8     median: 6757.5 (5%)     max: 6815 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3389     avg: 3588.7     median: 3681 (4%)     max: 3696 Points
min: 2563     avg: 3336.5     median: 3521 (4%)     max: 3542 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1070     avg: 1254.3     median: 1072 (85%)     max: 1258.7 s
min: 1025     avg: 1069     median: 1061 (84%)     max: 1129 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.61     avg: 39.6     median: 35.8 (136%)     max: 26.3 s
min: 32.18     avg: 33.7     median: 33.5 (127%)     max: 26.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1354     avg: 1366.5     median: 1366.5 (2%)     max: 1379 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.2 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
51.7 fps (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.074     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0758 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.127     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.133 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.165     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.172 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2306     avg: 2321     median: 2328 (5%)     max: 2329 Points
min: 2133     avg: 2215.2     median: 2231 (5%)     max: 2248 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.6     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (87%)     max: 17.83 s
min: 17.97     avg: 18.3     median: 18 (89%)     max: 18.93 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 39.64     avg: 40.3     median: 40.5 (157%)     max: 25.703 s
min: 40.64     avg: 41.6     median: 41 (160%)     max: 25.703 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 894     avg: 903.7     median: 904 (103%)     max: 873.522 s
min: 917     avg: 937     median: 937 (107%)     max: 873.522 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5141     avg: 5254.3     median: 5242 (5%)     max: 5380 Points
min: 4552     avg: 5130.7     median: 5216.5 (5%)     max: 5409 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1989 Points (5%)
2139 Points (6%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1621>1258.7 for benchmark 50, setting:204 +0s ... 0.094s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 48.33>26.3 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.096s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 35.7>26.3 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.098s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 40.78>25.703 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.113s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 43.78>25.703 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.114s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 958>873.522 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.117s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 28470> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.118s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 33690> for benchmark 10, setting:2277 +0s ... 0.119s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16510> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.12s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15900> for benchmark 11, setting:2278 +0s ... 0.122s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6.2> for benchmark 59, setting:224 +0s ... 0.123s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7.6> for benchmark 59, setting:224 +0s ... 0.124s

log 19. 05:39:03

#0 checking url part for id 3017 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2988 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3017 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#7 got single benchmarks 3017 +0.015s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2988 +0.002s ... 0.04s

#9 got single benchmarks 2988 +0.032s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.075s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.078s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.079s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.081s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.082s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.084s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.085s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.087s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.088s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.09s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.091s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.092s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.094s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.095s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.096s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.098s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.099s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.1s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.101s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.103s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.104s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.105s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.107s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.108s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.11s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.111s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.113s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.114s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.115s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.117s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.118s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.119s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.12s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.122s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.123s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.124s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.126s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.127s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.128s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.13s

#51 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.13s

#52 return log +0.029s ... 0.159s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)