Intel Celeron B810 vs Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron 847

Intel Celeron B810

► remove

The Intel Celeron B810 is a dual core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to the previous generation, the B810 should be similar fast as a 1.7-2 GHz Arrandale Celeron (e.g. Celeron P4500).

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The CPU was first leaked in support documents of Fujutsu laptops (Lifebook P701, S751, S761, ...).

Intel Celeron 887

► remove

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 847

► remove

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B810Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 847
Intel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Sandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
» Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
1600 MHz1500 MHz1100 MHz
2 MB2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
35 17 17
32 32 32
100 °C100 °C100 °C
PGA988BGA1023BGA1023
Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron B810Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 847
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
B810 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.25 Points
52%
847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (18%)
70%
1 847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (13%)     max: 0.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
B810 +
min: 2077     avg: 2089     median: 2091 (21%)     max: 2099
61%
847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (13%)     max: 1445
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
B810 +
min: 4020     avg: 4060     median: 4079 (7%)     max: 4081
59%
847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (4%)     max: 2789
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
B810 +
min: 4995     avg: 5023     median: 5022.5 (5%)     max: 5050 Points
63%
847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (3%)     max: 3453 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
B810 +
min: 2550     avg: 2572     median: 2571.5 (19%)     max: 2593 Points
65%
847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (13%)     max: 1793 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
B810 +
min: 1408.5     avg: 1411     median: 1411.1 (17%)     max: 1413.7 s
81%
847 +
2716 s (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
B810 +
min: 44.6     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (9%)     max: 44.9 s
92%
847 +
80.4 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 (6%)
84%
1 847 +
824 (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
71%
1 847 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
69%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
75%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
B810 +
min: 1630     avg: 1635     median: 1633 (9%)     max: 1641 Points
61%
847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (5%)     max: 1159 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
B810 +
min: 14     avg: 21.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 24.7 s
97%
847 +
35.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
B810 +
min: 32     avg: 47.6     median: 55.2 (2%)     max: 55.5 s
99%
847 +
78.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
B810 +
min: 762     avg: 1003     median: 1003.4 (4%)     max: 1244.8 s
96%
847 +
1780 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B810 +
24210 MIPS (11%)
62%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B810 +
11500 MFLOPS (9%)
64%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B810 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B810 +
min: 3750     avg: 3779     median: 3778.5 (4%)     max: 3807 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B810 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 94% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → 75% n=11

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)