, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron B710 vs Intel Celeron 877

Intel Celeron B710

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron B710 is a single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the B710 should be similar fast as a 2.1 GHz Celeron M 560.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

Intel Celeron 877

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 877 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 877 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 877 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore faster than the 1.4 GHz Pentium U5600.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron B710Intel Celeron 877
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
» Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
1600 MHz1400 MHz
64 KB128 KB
256 KB512 KB
1.5 MB2 MB
1 / 12 / 2
35 17
32 0.871-1.09132
100 °C100 °C
PGA988BGA1023
Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Celeron B710Intel Celeron 877

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
B710 +
0.6 Points (1%)
173%
877 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B710 +
2051 (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 B710 +
2574 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B710 +
2825 s (33%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B710 +
88.4 s (18%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 B710 +
631 (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 B710 +
3.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 B710 +
20.3 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 B710 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 B710 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 B710 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B710 +
868 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B710 +
25.1 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 B710 +
56.8 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 B710 +
1259 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B710 +
11230 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B710 +
5370 MFLOPS (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B710 +
1962 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B710 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 877 → 173% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 08:26:55

#0 checking url part for id 2835 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3342 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:08:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 2835 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 2835 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3342 +0s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 3342 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.024s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)