Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050U

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Picasso series (e.g. Ryzen 3000U APUs) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.3 to 3.2 GHz without SMT (two threads at once) and 4 MB of L3 Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 2 and offers only 2 CUs (128 shaders) clocked at up to 1,100 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Silver 3050C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 3050U, as of August 2023. Expect the chip to be just a few percentage points slower than the Athlon 3150U (two Zen cores, 4 threads, up to 3.3 GHz). This kind of performance should suffice for most day-to-day tasks but not much more than that.

Power consumption

This Athlon series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and peformance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the APU is built with a 14 nm process leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 2600X

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2600X

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600X is a high-end desktop processor with 6 cores (12 threads) that was announced early 2018. It is based on the revised Zen+ cores and at launch the second fastest Ryzen CPU behind the Ryzen 7 2700X. The CPU cores clock at 3.6 GHz base and using Precision Boost 2 up to 4.2 GHz. All 6 cores and 12 threads can clock up to 3.9 GHz. The 6 cores are divided in two cluster (3 cores each with own L3 cache) connected via Infinity Fabric.

Compared to the older first Ryzen generation (e.g., Ryzen 5 1600X), the second generation is manufactured in an improved process (12nm called), offers and improved Precision Boost 2 (especially in partial load of the cores) and faster cache and memory speeds.

See our second generation Ryzen review for detailed benchmarks and information.

ModelAMD Athlon Silver 3050UAMD Ryzen 5 2600X
CodenameDali (Zen)Zen+
SeriesAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Ryzen 5
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U « 2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2300 - 3200 MHz3600 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB4 MB
L3 Cache4 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 26 / 12
TDP15 Watt95 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4940 Million
Technology14 nm12 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP5AM4 (1331)
FeaturesDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMESSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com
Die Size209.78 mm2
$229 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2600X
28.4 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
421 Points (46%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2688 Points (7%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1341 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
163 Points (45%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.6 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4958 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
29954 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
48146 Points (31%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8272 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
133.8 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4599 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
33222 MIPS (19%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4293 MIPS (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
80.5 fps (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
207.4 fps (48%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.3 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.8 GB/s (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 350     avg: 352     median: 352 (2%)     max: 353.9 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
24.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
616 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
45760 Points (35%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12074 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73430 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73424 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74442 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
11855 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18091 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6530 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
743 Points (29%)
min: 1066     avg: 1145     median: 1144.5 (45%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1429 Points (3%)
min: 5816     avg: 6094     median: 6094 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1067 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5939 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4577     avg: 4642     median: 4641.5 (46%)     max: 4706 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21616     avg: 22301     median: 22301 (22%)     max: 22986 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
884 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
186 Points (33%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
171.7 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
164.4 Watt (30%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
8.2 Points per Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050U → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2600X → 290% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 00:31:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11695 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9980 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752705062s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11695 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 11695 +0.007s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9980 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 9980 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.037s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.039s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)