Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Athlon 300U vs AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

AMD Athlon 300U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Athlon 300U is a mobile entry level dual core SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines two Zen cores (with SMT / Hyperthreading so running 4 threads) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 3 graphics card with 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops. It is quite similar to the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U (2.6 - 3.5 GHz).

Compared to the Picasso APUs of the Ryzen 3000 series, the Athlon 300U is still based on the first generation of the 2000 series. Only the PRO variant is based on the new Zen+ microarchitecture that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvement.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

In contrast to the faster quad-core Picasso APUs, the Athlon 300U only supports 3 instead of 4 displays in total.

Performance wise, the Athlon 300 should be slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 2200U (2.5 - 3.4 GHz Dual Core with SMT).

AMD Ryzen 3 3300U

► remove from comparison AMD R3 3300U

The AMD Ryzen 3 3300U is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (no SMT / Hyperthreading so only 4 threads) clocked at 2.1 - 3.5 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 6 graphics card with 6 CUs (384 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz. Specified at 15 Watt TDP, the SoC is intended for thin mid-range laptops.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

AMD states that the Picasso APUs are about 8% faster than the predecessors. Therefore, the Ryzen 3 3300U should be similar to the Ryzen 5 2500U (2 - 3.6 GHz but with SMT).

ModelAMD Athlon 300UAMD Ryzen 3 3300U
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZenZen+
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Zen+
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U compare2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3350U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U compare2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 3300 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm12 nm
SocketAM4AM4
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R3 3300U
24.6 pt (34%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
308 Points (34%)
337 Points (37%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
637 Points (2%)
921 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
308 Points (2%)
471 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
119 Points (36%)
134 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3968 Points (24%)
4280 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8724 Points (6%)
12357 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
404.6 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.4 s (3%)
11.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1623 Points (3%)
2398 Points (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
12118 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3340 MIPS (40%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
18.5 fps (6%)
26.2 fps (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
88.6 fps (20%)
132.1 fps (30%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.8 fps (3%)
2.8 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (5%)
2.7 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1212 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4332 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
12.8 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31.8 s (1%)
28.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
807 s (4%)
709 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3427 Points (9%)
4587 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
41974 Points (34%)
51741 Points (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
41029 Points (33%)
47170 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
45359 Points (38%)
55407 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3217 Points (8%)
3953 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4729 Points (8%)
5629 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1361 Points (6%)
2006 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
867 Points (37%)
824 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1840 Points (3%)
2578 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
765 Points (3%)
843 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1552 Points (5%)
2722 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3287 Points (33%)
3861 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6053 Points (7%)
10787 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3213 Points (44%)
3672 Points (50%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5763 Points (14%)
10223 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6134 Points (11%)
10170 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2919 Points (57%)
3469 Points (68%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6471 Points (10%)
11467 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3196 Points (48%)
3780 Points (57%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4852 Points (39%)
8470 Points (68%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4449 Points (40%)
6808 Points (62%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
9250 Points (18%)
12111 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6447 Points (13%)
8746 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6868 Points (18%)
9508 Points (25%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1452 ms (2%)
min: 1192     avg: 1237     median: 1236.5 (1%)     max: 1281 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
133.6 ms (1%)
136.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
22253 Points (20%)
27764 Points (25%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
143 Points (30%)
min: 141     avg: 153.5     median: 153.5 (32%)     max: 166 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon 300U → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 3300U → 131% n=46

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 09:43:57

#0 checking url part for id 11201 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11181 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11201 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 11201 +0.012s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11181 +0.02s ... 0.064s

#9 got single benchmarks 11181 +0.012s ... 0.076s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.341s ... 0.417s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.441s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)