Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G76 MP4

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

ARM Mali-G76 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP4

The ARM Mali-G76 MP4 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in 2019 in the Mediatek G90 and G90T (e.g. Redmi Note 8 Pro). The G76MP4 integrates 4 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster. 

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 680ARM Mali-G76 MP4
Mali-G Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology7 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018 31.08.2018
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines4 - unified
Core Speed800 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G76 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G958 x 2000 MHz? MHz900 MHz
Mediatek Helio G90T8 x 2050 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? MHz800 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 35214     avg: 37620     median: 36546 (4%)     max: 40738 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2412     avg: 3073     median: 3125 (14%)     max: 3336 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2323     avg: 3061     median: 3102.5 (7%)     max: 3335 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2412     avg: 2690     median: 2694 (13%)     max: 2855 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2322     avg: 2590     median: 2682 (8%)     max: 2745 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1352     avg: 1418     median: 1387 (1%)     max: 1502 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 376     avg: 389     median: 381 (0%)     max: 418 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (3%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.7 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 6.5     avg: 7.6     median: 7.5 (1%)     max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 20.1     median: 20 (1%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 18.4     median: 18 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 29     avg: 30.5     median: 30 (1%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 49.1     median: 49.5 (3%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP4
min: 78     avg: 80.8     median: 80 (1%)     max: 85 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 80891     avg: 91204     median: 92280.5 (12%)     max: 99365 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 29.83     avg: 29.9     median: 29.9 (0%)     max: 29.88 fps
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10187     avg: 19426     median: 23456 (23%)     max: 24634 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3678     avg: 16986     median: 23228 (41%)     max: 24051 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.16     avg: 5.2     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 8.05 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP4 → 57% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G76 MP4:
17  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G76 MP4:
44 59 60 60 60 85 ~ 61 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G76 MP4:
30 38 40 40 40 51 ~ 40 fps
med.
Mali-G76 MP4:
30 38 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
high
Mali-G76 MP4:
29 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Mali-G76 MP4:
30  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
ultra
Mali-G76 MP4:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G76 MP4:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G76 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G76 MP4:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G76 MP4:
60  fps
ARM Mali-G76 MP4lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact17
Armajet61
PUBG Mobile40383130
Arena of Valor60
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
2


1


2
3

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 02:12:01

#0 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9947 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.121s ... 0.122s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.122s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.122s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.035s ... 0.157s

#8 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.014s ... 0.172s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9947 +0.002s ... 0.174s

#10 got single benchmarks 9947 +0.04s ... 0.213s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.214s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.082s ... 0.295s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.295s

#14 Got 35 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.318s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.318s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.322s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.34s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.34s

#19 return log +0.05s ... 0.39s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)