Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G72 MP18 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G72 MP18

The ARM Mali-G72 MP18 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced in early 2018 in the Exynos 9810 (e.g. Galaxy S9). It integrates 18 of the 32 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing.

In our benchmarks it slightly below a Adreno 540 and is therefore suitable for demanding mobile games.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP2

The ARM Mali-G57 MP2 (or MC2) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2021 in the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and uses 2 clusters (hence the MC2/MP2 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP2 in our benchmarks is comparable to the Adreno 618.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

Qualcomm Adreno 680ARM Mali-G72 MP18ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Mali-G Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 24
Mali-G78 MP22 24
Mali-G78 MP20 24
Mali-G78 MP14 14
Mali-G77 MP11 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 2
Mali-G52 MP2 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 2
Mali-G57 MP1 1
Mali-G51 MP4 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology7 nm16 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018 01.01.2018 03.07.2020
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines18 - unified2 - unified
Core Speed850 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CodenameValhall
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G72 MP18GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98108 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek MT8188J8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 8108 x 2000 MHz? MHz1068 MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz680 - ? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36190     avg: 43744     median: 46610 (5%)     max: 48433 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3744     avg: 3994     median: 4054.5 (18%)     max: 4124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3958     avg: 4626     median: 4820 (11%)     max: 4904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3376     avg: 3634     median: 3435 (17%)     max: 4291 Points
min: 969     avg: 2540     median: 2522.5 (13%)     max: 3489 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3697     avg: 4023     median: 3794.5 (11%)     max: 4806 Points
min: 825     avg: 2420     median: 2342.5 (7%)     max: 3908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1003     avg: 1166     median: 1166 (1%)     max: 1340 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 309     avg: 356.8     median: 329 (0%)     max: 1073 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (3%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
11 fps (2%)
min: 1.9     avg: 5.6     median: 5.6 (1%)     max: 6.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
31 fps (2%)
min: 5.2     avg: 14.9     median: 15 (1%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 28.3     median: 28 (3%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 40.5     median: 45.5 (1%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 74     median: 73.5 (4%)     max: 76 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G72 MP18
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1179     avg: 1242     median: 1249 (0%)     max: 1292 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1133     avg: 1228     median: 1244 (0%)     max: 1290 Points
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8620     avg: 8803     median: 8802.5 (9%)     max: 8985 Points
min: 13388     avg: 20840     median: 20466 (20%)     max: 26779 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4747     avg: 4762     median: 4762 (8%)     max: 4777 Points
min: 10582     avg: 18758     median: 19555.5 (34%)     max: 24231 Points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G72 MP18 → 103% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP2 → 45% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP2:
29 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
Mali-G57 MP2:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Mali-G57 MP2:
35.4 37 55 ~ 42 fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP2:
22 23.2 23.5 ~ 23 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 30 30 30 59 59 59 60 60 61 82 ~ 51 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30 37.4 39 39.4 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP2:
40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
40  fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
29 29.1 29.3 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
39 90 ~ 65 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
30  30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30  fps
high
Mali-G72 MP18:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Mali-G57 MP2:
30  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-G57 MP2:
60 60 60 89 ~ 67 fps
ARM Mali-G57 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Genshin Impact4223
Armajet51
PUBG Mobile394030
Dead Trigger 265
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers67
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4


1


3
2
1
1
1






ARM Mali-G72 MP18lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile4040
World of Tanks Blitz60
Arena of Valor6060
Shadow Fight 360
Battle Bay60
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne30
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1




4
3


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 20:37:23

#0 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8770 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10691 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.147s ... 0.148s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.148s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.148s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.04s ... 0.188s

#9 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.013s ... 0.201s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8770 +0.002s ... 0.202s

#11 got single benchmarks 8770 +0.009s ... 0.212s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10691 +0.002s ... 0.213s

#13 got single benchmarks 10691 +0.169s ... 0.383s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.383s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.496s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.496s

#17 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.038s ... 0.534s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.534s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.54s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.035s ... 0.575s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.575s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.577s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)