Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP5

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

ARM Mali-G57 MP5

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP5

The ARM Mali-G57 MP5 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 and uses 5 clusters (hence the MC5/MP5 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP5 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 820 / Remi 10x) is comparable to the Adreno 540 and also the ARM Mali-G57 MP6 (most likely due to higher clock rates).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 680ARM Mali-G57 MP5
Mali-G Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12
Power Consumption7 Watt
technology7 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement06.12.2018 03.07.2020
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureBifrost
Pipelines5 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP5GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 8208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
38974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5469 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
5991 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4497 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
4798 Points (14%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (3%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (2%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
32 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
29 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
52 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
71 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP5
115 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
42 fps (0%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP5 → 82% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
med.
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Mali-G57 MP5:
30  fps
ARM Mali-G57 MP5lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends30
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1


2
1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 00:37:47

#0 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10480 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.116s ... 0.117s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.117s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.117s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.026s ... 0.143s

#8 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.013s ... 0.157s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10480 +0.002s ... 0.158s

#10 got single benchmarks 10480 +0.01s ... 0.168s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.168s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.221s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.221s

#14 Got 5 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.224s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.224s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.225s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.232s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.232s

#19 return log +0.059s ... 0.291s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)