Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Qualcomm Adreno 612

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 680Qualcomm Adreno 612
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 685 (compare)
Adreno 680
Adreno 650 (compare)
Adreno 640 (compare)
Adreno 630 (compare)
Adreno 618 (compare)
Adreno 616 (compare)
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 (compare)
Adreno 685 (compare)
Adreno 680
Adreno 650 (compare)
Adreno 640 (compare)
Adreno 630 (compare)
Adreno 618 (compare)
Adreno 616 (compare)
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 (compare)
yesyes
DirectXDirectX 12DirectX 12.1
Technology7 nm14 nm
Introduced06.12.2018 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz? MHz? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 26348     avg: 26541     median: 26541 (5%)     max: 26734 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 1734     avg: 1735.5     median: 1735 (13%)     max: 1737 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 1571     avg: 1592.5     median: 1592 (6%)     max: 1614 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
min: 1097     avg: 1103.5     median: 1103 (16%)     max: 1110 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
min: 851     avg: 900     median: 900 (11%)     max: 949 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
min: 20     avg: 20.5     median: 20 (4%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
19 fps (5%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.9     median: 3 (2%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
min: 3     avg: 3.9     median: 3 (2%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
8.2 fps (4%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
9.1 fps (2%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
8.1 fps (2%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
7.1 fps (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
9815 Points (47%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
1491 Points (24%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
Adreno 612:
60 fps  fps
Adreno 612:
»
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 612:
60 fps  fps
Adreno 612:
»

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 612:
20 fps  fps
high
Adreno 612:
16 fps  fps
Adreno 612:
»

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)