Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642L

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642L

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642L

The Qualcomm Adreno 642L is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642L GPU offers a 40% improved performance over the Adreno 620 (compared to the specified +50% of the 642 in the SD 780G), its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642L supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 778G and therefore also the 642L is manufactured in the modern 6nm UEV process at TSMC that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 642L
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm8 nm6 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement02.12.2020 15.12.2015 07.05.2021
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (23%)
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
min: 88482     avg: 89308     median: 89307.5 (10%)     max: 90133 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 6398     avg: 6666     median: 6638 (29%)     max: 7281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 7199     avg: 7627     median: 7536 (17%)     max: 8605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (44%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 5032     avg: 5413     median: 5393.5 (27%)     max: 5763 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (35%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
min: 5103     avg: 5654     median: 5612 (17%)     max: 6240 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 635     avg: 1108     median: 1194.5 (1%)     max: 1227 Points
min: 2321     avg: 2517     median: 2493.5 (1%)     max: 2831 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 189     avg: 327.8     median: 351 (0%)     max: 371 Points
min: 681     avg: 696     median: 687.5 (1%)     max: 768 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
min: 2.9     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 4 fps
min: 5.9     avg: 6.2     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 13     avg: 13.6     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.1     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 34     avg: 36.4     median: 36 (3%)     max: 40 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 59     median: 62 (7%)     max: 74 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
min: 33     avg: 33.7     median: 33 (4%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 93.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.4     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
min: 56     avg: 57.7     median: 57 (1%)     max: 64 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 135.5     median: 138 (8%)     max: 180 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.4     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
min: 77     avg: 79.1     median: 78 (5%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 161     avg: 241     median: 257 (2%)     max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 87.8     median: 91 (1%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642L
min: 132     avg: 134.9     median: 133 (1%)     max: 148 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834     avg: 295219     median: 305358 (38%)     max: 321314 Points
min: 65241     avg: 91217     median: 97281.5 (12%)     max: 102780 Points
min: 135972     avg: 157798     median: 157454 (20%)     max: 175807 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (1%)     max: 109.3 fps
min: 19.62     avg: 26.6     median: 26.8 (0%)     max: 29.71 fps
min: 45.96     avg: 49.6     median: 46.9 (0%)     max: 54.4 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (54%)
min: 8763     avg: 23246     median: 25388 (25%)     max: 30058 Points
min: 23666     avg: 31803     median: 30994 (31%)     max: 38436 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (74%)
min: 3274     avg: 19611     median: 22384 (39%)     max: 28746 Points
min: 26134     avg: 36660     median: 40236 (70%)     max: 43000 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25     avg: 9.6     median: 10.2 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt
min: 2.69     avg: 3.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt
min: 0     avg: 4.3     median: 4 (2%)     max: 9.27 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 32% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 54% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
59 59 ~ 59 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 642L:
51 60 ~ 56 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
102%
Adreno 642L:
61  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
67%
Adreno 619:
20 45 54 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
61%
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
47%
Adreno 619:
20 28 30 ~ 26 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
83%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
124%
Adreno 642L:
60 60 60 60 89 99 103 119 120 121 ~ 89 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
59%
Adreno 619:
29 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
88%
Adreno 642L:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
67%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
67%
Adreno 642L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
57%
Adreno 619:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
70%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
54%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
36%
Adreno 642L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
50%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
50%
Adreno 642L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps
Adreno 642L:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 58%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 64%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642L → 73%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 73%

Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact403626
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 642Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal5956
League of Legends: Wild Rift61
Armajet89
PUBG Mobile584038
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


2
3

1
1






Qualcomm Adreno 660lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011960
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Genshin Impact59.358.855.6
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile66605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
1

1
4
1
2
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 16. 20:30:26

#0 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10945 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.119s ... 0.12s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.12s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.12s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.044s ... 0.164s

#9 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.079s ... 0.244s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.001s ... 0.245s

#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.098s ... 0.343s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10945 +0.002s ... 0.345s

#13 got single benchmarks 10945 +0.052s ... 0.397s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.397s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.187s ... 0.584s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.585s

#17 Got 271 rows for game benchmarks. +0.076s ... 0.66s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.66s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.666s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.024s ... 0.69s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.69s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.693s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)