Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 610 vs Qualcomm Adreno 642

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Qualcomm Adreno 610

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 610 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In synthetic benchmarks, the Adreno 610 positions itself between the old Adreno 510 and Adreno 512 / 612

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 642
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm11 nm5 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement02.12.2020 09.04.2019 07.05.2021
ArchitectureAdreno 600
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 610GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6658 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
200519 Points (23%)
min: 15403     avg: 22761     median: 24487.5 (3%)     max: 25351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
min: 975     avg: 1844     median: 1819 (8%)     max: 2254 Points
5587 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
min: 1295     avg: 1746     median: 1737 (4%)     max: 2187 Points
8380 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (44%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 267     avg: 1164     median: 1164 (6%)     max: 1597 Points
4478 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (35%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 240     avg: 1027     median: 1029.5 (3%)     max: 1436 Points
6148 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 205     avg: 402.5     median: 418 (0%)     max: 634 Points
3212 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 100     avg: 119.8     median: 122 (0%)     max: 141 Points
786 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
min: 1.1     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
min: 1.4     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
min: 5.1     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (1%)     max: 10.1 fps
50 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 42     avg: 59     median: 62 (7%)     max: 74 fps
min: 5.2     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
40 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 52     avg: 93.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
min: 9.3     avg: 13.3     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16 fps
65 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 73     avg: 135.5     median: 138 (8%)     max: 180 fps
min: 14     avg: 19.4     median: 19 (1%)     max: 24 fps
90 fps (5%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 161     avg: 241     median: 257 (2%)     max: 294 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 610
min: 24     avg: 35.9     median: 36 (0%)     max: 45 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
153 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 200834     avg: 295219     median: 305358 (38%)     max: 321314 Points
min: 23743     avg: 39171     median: 38601 (5%)     max: 53821 Points
162946 Points (20%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (1%)     max: 109.3 fps
min: 8.79     avg: 11.7     median: 11.4 (0%)     max: 14.76 fps
48 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
343 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
577 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
53822 Points (54%)
min: 7370     avg: 16213     median: 17873 (18%)     max: 21734 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42266 Points (74%)
min: 1595     avg: 12281     median: 13408 (23%)     max: 20711 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.25     avg: 9.6     median: 10.2 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt
min: 2.25     avg: 3.5     median: 3 (1%)     max: 6.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 12% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 58% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 610:
25.6  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 610:
26.5  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 610:
60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
50%
Adreno 610:
56 59 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
91  fps
56%
Adreno 610:
42 59 ~ 51 fps
high
Adreno 610:
40  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
48%
Adreno 610:
29  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
56%
Adreno 610:
26.3 37 37 ~ 33 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
26%
Adreno 610:
15  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
23%
Adreno 610:
11 14 15 ~ 13 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
72%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 38 44 50 53 54 57 57 59 59 60 60 60 87 ~ 52 fps
42%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
45%
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
91%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
42%
Adreno 610:
25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps
98%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
46%
Adreno 610:
25  fps
111%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
ultra
Adreno 610:
30 30 30 60 ~ 38 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
37%
Adreno 610:
60 60 66 ~ 62 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 610:
20 20 24 26 30 59 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
33%
Adreno 610:
11 12 15 17 22 23 41.5 ~ 20 fps
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 610:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 610 → 49%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 62%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 92%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 610lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal25.626.5
League of Legends: Wild Rift6059
Call of Duty Mobile514029
Genshin Impact331513
Armajet52
PUBG Mobile302525
Arena of Valor3838
Dead Trigger 262
Asphalt 9: Legends3020
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
5
1
2


2
3
2
3
1







Qualcomm Adreno 660lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011960
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Genshin Impact59.358.855.6
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile66605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
1

1
4
1
2
2






Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

1


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 07:34:10

#0 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9921 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.308s ... 0.31s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.31s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.31s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.071s ... 0.381s

#9 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.124s ... 0.505s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9921 +0.002s ... 0.507s

#11 got single benchmarks 9921 +0.189s ... 0.696s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.002s ... 0.699s

#13 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.01s ... 0.709s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.709s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.249s ... 0.958s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.958s

#17 Got 222 rows for game benchmarks. +0.114s ... 1.072s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.072s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 1.08s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.032s ... 1.111s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 1.111s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 1.114s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)