Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 650 vs Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 650Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600RDNA 2Adreno 600
Core Speed250 - 670 (Boost) MHz555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
technology7 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement04.12.2019 18.01.2022 09.04.2019
CodenameRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
136.6 fps (3%)
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
2688 Points (1%)
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
2532 Points (1%)
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
54110 Points (19%)
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42627 Points (71%)
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.18     avg: 8.2     median: 7.6 (3%)     max: 12.7 Watt
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 108% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 42% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
67%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
67%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
67%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
67%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
99%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
97%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
38%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps
94%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
106%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
72%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
62%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
68%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
69%
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
60%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
58%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
74%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
75%
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
91%
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
67%
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
71%
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 80%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 80%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 70%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 68%

Qualcomm Adreno 650Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6060
League of Legends: Wild Rift90898960606060
Call of Duty Mobile6060
Genshin Impact606059.559.358.25223
Armajet716775
PUBG Mobile615853404439.532384031
Arena of Valor61604545
Dead Trigger 210091
Asphalt 9: Legends45413029
Real Racing 3102
Qualcomm Adreno 650Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
5

1


2
4

1
5






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 17. 13:30:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752751838s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0.015s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.035s ... 0.069s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.07s

#12 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.075s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.075s

#14 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.02s ... 0.095s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.104s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.105s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.106s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.107s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.126s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.127s

#22 Got 215 rows for game benchmarks. +0.023s ... 0.149s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.149s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.15s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.154s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.154s

#27 return log +0.001s ... 0.155s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)