, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 685

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 685

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 685

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 is an integrated graphics card in the Microsoft SQ1 ARM-based SoC. It is similar to the Adreno 680 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops but higher clocked and therefore with a higher theoretical performance (2 versus 1.8 TFlops).

Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 685
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 06.12.2018
DirectXDirectX 12
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 685GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Microsoft SQ18 x 3000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1968 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1927 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 685
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
373 (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
168 fps (1%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
90 fps (3%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 685
59 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (10%)
31.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
79 fps (22%)
24.6 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
26 fps (17%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
42 fps (20%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (9%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
35 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2292 (5%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 685 → 60% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642:
30 fps  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642:
59 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 642:
40 fps  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60 fps  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 20:39:52

#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9954 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.024s ... 0.068s

#8 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.005s ... 0.073s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9954 +0s ... 0.073s

#10 got single benchmarks 9954 +0.004s ... 0.077s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.083s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#14 Got 7 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.086s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.086s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.087s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.09s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.093s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)