Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 642 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L

Qualcomm Adreno 642

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 642

The Qualcomm Adreno 642 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G SoC. The chip will be available from mid 2021 and will be used mainly in upper mid-range Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 642 GPU offers a 50% improved performance over the Adreno 620, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 768G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR4X-4200 memory support of the SoC.

The Adreno 642 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5nm LPPE process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 619L
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology5 nm8 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 15.12.2015 15.12.2015
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
CPU in Adreno 642GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G8 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
44899 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
5587 Points (24%)
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
8380 Points (18%)
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
4478 Points (22%)
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (12%)     max: 2348 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
6148 Points (18%)
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (6%)     max: 2187 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
3212 Points (2%)
min: 635     avg: 1108     median: 1194.5 (1%)     max: 1227 Points
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
786 Points (1%)
min: 189     avg: 327.8     median: 351 (0%)     max: 371 Points
247 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
18 fps (3%)
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
5.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
50 fps (4%)
min: 17     avg: 20.1     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
40 fps (5%)
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
65 fps (1%)
min: 26     avg: 32.4     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
90 fps (5%)
min: 33     avg: 45.4     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 642
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
153 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 87.8     median: 91 (1%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
162946 Points (20%)
min: 65241     avg: 91217     median: 97281.5 (12%)     max: 102780 Points
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
48 fps (0%)
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 22.85 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8763     avg: 23246     median: 25388 (25%)     max: 30058 Points
13095 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 3274     avg: 19611     median: 22384 (39%)     max: 28746 Points
1751 Points (3%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.69     avg: 3.6     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 7.31 Watt
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 52% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 40% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 619:
20 45 54 ~ 40 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
Adreno 619:
20 28 30 ~ 26 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 642:
30  fps
200%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
65%
Adreno 619:
29 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
67%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 642:
59  fps
68%
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
68%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
52%
Adreno 619:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
50%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 642:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 642:
60  fps
50%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
48%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 642 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 81%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 58%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 67%

Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact403626
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 619Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends29
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1

1
1
2


1






Qualcomm Adreno 642lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile60596040
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2

1


1
2

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 09:02:40

#0 checking url part for id 10693 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10693 +0.041s ... 0.173s

#9 got single benchmarks 10693 +0.008s ... 0.181s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.002s ... 0.183s

#11 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.112s ... 0.295s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.002s ... 0.297s

#13 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.011s ... 0.308s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.308s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.143s ... 0.451s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.451s

#17 Got 130 rows for game benchmarks. +0.047s ... 0.499s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.499s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.503s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.522s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.522s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.524s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)