Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 660
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600RDNA 2
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology8 nm4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 18.01.2022 02.12.2020
CodenameRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 18 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
200519 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 8065     avg: 10160     median: 10372 (45%)     max: 11534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 10491     avg: 15129     median: 15637.5 (34%)     max: 17179 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (10%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 5094     avg: 8481     median: 8770 (37%)     max: 9839 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (5%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 7930     avg: 11533     median: 11753 (29%)     max: 12914 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (29%)     max: 3215 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 7991     avg: 8422     median: 8055 (72%)     max: 9221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197     avg: 3201     median: 3200.5 (19%)     max: 3204 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 10111     avg: 11212     median: 10261 (62%)     max: 13263 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178     avg: 2188     median: 2188 (11%)     max: 2198 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 6140     avg: 6868     median: 6868 (34%)     max: 7596 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (7%)     max: 1992 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 6816     avg: 8126     median: 8126 (27%)     max: 9436 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 3959     avg: 5588     median: 5761.5 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 974     avg: 1423     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 11     avg: 12.3     median: 13 (5%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27.5 (5%)     max: 32 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 39     avg: 69.2     median: 71 (5%)     max: 87 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 15 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 42     avg: 59     median: 62 (6%)     max: 74 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 52     avg: 93.6     median: 95 (2%)     max: 126 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 73     avg: 135.5     median: 138 (6%)     max: 180 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
min: 161     avg: 241     median: 257 (2%)     max: 294 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (8%)
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 200834     avg: 295219     median: 305358 (31%)     max: 321314 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 107.62     avg: 108.5     median: 108.5 (3%)     max: 109.3 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
53822 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
42266 Points (70%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 6.25     avg: 9.6     median: 10.2 (4%)     max: 13.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 408% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 425% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Adreno 660:
118 119.2 ~ 119 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60 60.2 ~ 60 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
Adreno 660:
59.3  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
Adreno 660:
58.8  fps
ultra
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Adreno 660:
55.6  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
110%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
165%
Adreno 660:
59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 66 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
99%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
150%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
107%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
180%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
277%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 660:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
207%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 660:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 105%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 105%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 168%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 150%

Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 660
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60606011960
Call of Duty Mobile609160
Genshin Impact59.559.358.259.358.855.6
Armajet6772
PUBG Mobile4040304439.53266605440
Dead Trigger 260166
Asphalt 9: Legends296060
Real Racing 36060
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 660
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1
2


1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
1

1
4
1
2
2






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 17. 13:25:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752751510s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.02s ... 0.05s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.005s ... 0.055s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.055s

#12 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.06s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0s ... 0.061s

#14 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.028s ... 0.088s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.096s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.097s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.098s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.099s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.116s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.116s

#22 Got 134 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.128s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.128s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.129s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.132s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.132s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.132s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)