Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 618

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 618

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 618 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 and 730G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

In our benchmarks, the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 was 14 to 30% faster than the Adreno 616 in the Snapdragon 710. The performance in the 730G should be additional 15% faster, due to higher clock rates.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 618
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600RDNA 2Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology8 nm4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 18.01.2022 09.04.2019
CodenameRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 618GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 28 x 2550 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c8 x 2400 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 3 more
min. - max.500 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
129 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
112 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 44009     avg: 51701     median: 52650 (5%)     max: 56640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2900 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
3273 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
494 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
504 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 3002     avg: 3603     median: 3646 (16%)     max: 3939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 3101     avg: 3734     median: 3753.5 (8%)     max: 4256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (10%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 2214     avg: 2624     median: 2626 (11%)     max: 2938 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (5%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 2085     avg: 2495     median: 2471 (6%)     max: 2832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 3208     avg: 3212     median: 3211.5 (29%)     max: 3215 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 2845     avg: 3469     median: 3528 (31%)     max: 4021 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 3197     avg: 3201     median: 3200.5 (19%)     max: 3204 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 2720     avg: 3552     median: 3610 (22%)     max: 4232 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 2178     avg: 2188     median: 2188 (11%)     max: 2198 Points
0 Points (0%)
min: 2192     avg: 2505     median: 2489 (12%)     max: 2783 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 1982     avg: 1987     median: 1987 (7%)     max: 1992 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 2008     avg: 2355     median: 2310 (8%)     max: 2694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 637     avg: 899     median: 934 (0%)     max: 1124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 258     avg: 447     median: 313 (0%)     max: 1047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
1921 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
1849 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 624     avg: 639     median: 645 (1%)     max: 648 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 572     avg: 590     median: 599 (0%)     max: 599 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 618
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
288 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 5.4     avg: 7     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 15     avg: 18.1     median: 18 (1%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (1%)     max: 15 fps
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 14     avg: 17.1     median: 17 (2%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 24     avg: 29.8     median: 30 (1%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 34     avg: 40.9     median: 41 (2%)     max: 45 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 618
min: 67     avg: 83.1     median: 84.5 (1%)     max: 91 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (8%)
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 74888     avg: 89032     median: 90943.5 (9%)     max: 95350 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (1%)     max: 22.85 fps
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 23.89     avg: 26.3     median: 26.3 (1%)     max: 28.78 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (4%)
min: 10269     avg: 16045     median: 10289 (4%)     max: 27578 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 3043     avg: 9739     median: 3056 (5%)     max: 23117 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
3.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 408% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 115% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 618:
114  fps
high
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Adreno 618:
99  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
139%
Adreno 618:
83.5  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Adreno 618:
60  fps
high
Adreno 618:
58  fps
ultra
Adreno 618:
57  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
Adreno 618:
30 30 60.5 65 71 82 ~ 56 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
110%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
95%
Adreno 618:
30 38 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
99%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
100%
Adreno 618:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
107%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
100%
Adreno 618:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 61 61 ~ 54 fps
ultra
Adreno 618:
30 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 55 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 618:
60  fps
high
Adreno 618:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
Adreno 618:
27.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
19.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
9.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
8.7  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
Adreno 618:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 618:
27 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
103%
Adreno 618:
27 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
Adreno 618:
23  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
17.6  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 618:
16.9  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
Diablo III

Diablo III

2012
low 1024x768
Adreno 618:
20.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Adreno 618:
20  fps
high 1366x768
Adreno 618:
17.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Adreno 618:
12  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 105%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 105%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 618 → 108%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 618
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60601149983.5
Call of Duty Mobile60605857
Armajet6756
PUBG Mobile4040304439.532384030
Arena of Valor5455
Shadow Fight 36060
Dota 2 Reborn27.619.79.68.7
Asphalt 8: Airborne30
Asphalt 9: Legends293030
BioShock Infinite2317.616.9
Diablo III20.72017.212
Qualcomm Adreno 619LSamsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 618
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1



1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
2









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
3
3
3
1

3
5
2
2
2
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 17. 08:09:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9900 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752732579s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.024s ... 0.056s

#10 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.005s ... 0.062s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0s ... 0.062s

#12 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.067s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9900 +0s ... 0.067s

#14 got single benchmarks 9900 +0.021s ... 0.088s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.088s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.098s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.099s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.1s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.101s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.119s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.12s

#22 Got 105 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.131s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.131s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.132s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.137s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.137s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.137s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)