Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 616

Qualcomm Adreno 619L

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 616

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 616 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 512 in the Snapdragon 660).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 619LQualcomm Adreno 616
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology8 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 15.12.2015
CPU in Adreno 619LGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 616GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7128 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7108 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6708 x 2016 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
44899 Points (5%)
min: 22381     avg: 37106     median: 38288.5 (4%)     max: 43514 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 3122     avg: 3225     median: 3224.5 (14%)     max: 3327 Points
min: 2217     avg: 2635     median: 2636 (11%)     max: 2859 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 3307     avg: 3311     median: 3311 (7%)     max: 3315 Points
min: 2146     avg: 2733     median: 2847 (6%)     max: 3248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 2308     avg: 2328     median: 2328 (12%)     max: 2348 Points
min: 1742     avg: 1917     median: 1913.5 (10%)     max: 2217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2120     avg: 2154     median: 2153.5 (6%)     max: 2187 Points
min: 1611     avg: 1825     median: 1853.5 (6%)     max: 2147 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809     avg: 818     median: 817.5 (0%)     max: 826 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 4.4     avg: 5.2     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 7.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 12     avg: 13.6     median: 14 (1%)     max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (2%)     max: 15 fps
min: 8.5     avg: 12.5     median: 13 (1%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
26 fps (1%)
min: 19     avg: 22.4     median: 23 (0%)     max: 26 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (2%)     max: 37 fps
min: 29     avg: 31.8     median: 32 (2%)     max: 36 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 72     avg: 72.5     median: 72.5 (1%)     max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 616
min: 46     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 74 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78     avg: 22.8     median: 22.8 (0%)     max: 22.85 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
13095 Points (13%)
min: 8622     avg: 9428     median: 9192.5 (9%)     max: 10698 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
1751 Points (3%)
min: 2466     avg: 2689     median: 2629.5 (5%)     max: 2911 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 90% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
ultra
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
90%
Adreno 616:
30 38 40 ~ 36 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
27 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 616:
31 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 616:
54 57 60 60 ~ 58 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
Adreno 616:
59 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps
83%
Adreno 616:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 616:
26 29 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
29  fps
97%
Adreno 616:
22 27 29 29 29 29 30 30 ~ 28 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Adreno 619L:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 92%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 87%

Qualcomm Adreno 619Llowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
PUBG Mobile404030
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends29
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1

1
1
2


1






Qualcomm Adreno 616lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile3630
Arena of Valor5358
Shadow Fight 36060
Dead Trigger 250
Asphalt 9: Legends2928
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
2
1



1
2
1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 18:52:24

#0 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9401 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.076s ... 0.077s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.077s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.077s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.027s ... 0.104s

#8 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.013s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9401 +0.002s ... 0.119s

#10 got single benchmarks 9401 +0.04s ... 0.158s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.158s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.247s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.247s

#14 Got 52 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.262s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.262s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.266s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.019s ... 0.285s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.285s

#19 return log +0.066s ... 0.351s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)