Qualcomm Adreno 616 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619L vs Qualcomm Adreno 612
Qualcomm Adreno 616 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 616 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 512 in the Snapdragon 660 ).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 619L ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 619L is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 612 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).
The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).
Qualcomm Adreno 616 Qualcomm Adreno 619L Qualcomm Adreno 612 Adreno 600 Series Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Adreno 600 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan technology 14 nm 8 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 15.12.2015 15.12.2015
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 22381 avg: 37106 median: 38288.5 (4%) max: 43514 Points
44899 Points (5%)
min: 26320 avg: 28142 median: 26734 (3%) max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 2217 avg: 2635 median: 2636 (11%) max: 2859 Points
min: 3122 avg: 3225 median: 3224.5 (14%) max: 3327 Points
min: 1621 avg: 1897 median: 1737 (8%) max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 2146 avg: 2733 median: 2847 (6%) max: 3248 Points
min: 3307 avg: 3311 median: 3311 (7%) max: 3315 Points
min: 1571 avg: 1784 median: 1614 (4%) max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1742 avg: 1917 median: 1913.5 (10%) max: 2217 Points
min: 2308 avg: 2328 median: 2328 (12%) max: 2348 Points
min: 1057 avg: 1207 median: 1110 (6%) max: 1499 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1611 avg: 1825 median: 1853.5 (6%) max: 2147 Points
min: 2120 avg: 2154 median: 2153.5 (6%) max: 2187 Points
min: 851 avg: 1030 median: 955 (3%) max: 1303 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 809 avg: 818 median: 817.5 (0%) max: 826 Points
482 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
247 Points (0%)
143 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 4.4 avg: 5.2 median: 5.1 (1%) max: 7.8 fps
5.8 fps (1%)
min: 3 avg: 3.6 median: 3.3 (1%) max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 12 avg: 13.6 median: 14 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 15 avg: 15.5 median: 15.5 (1%) max: 16 fps
min: 9 avg: 9.4 median: 9.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8.5 avg: 12.5 median: 13 (1%) max: 15 fps
min: 14 avg: 14.5 median: 14.5 (2%) max: 15 fps
min: 8 avg: 8.5 median: 8.2 (1%) max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 19 avg: 22.4 median: 23 (0%) max: 26 fps
26 fps (1%)
min: 14 avg: 15.7 median: 15 (0%) max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 29 avg: 31.8 median: 32 (2%) max: 36 fps
min: 36 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (2%) max: 37 fps
min: 20 avg: 22 median: 21 (1%) max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 616 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 46 avg: 62.4 median: 65 (1%) max: 74 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619L
min: 72 avg: 72.5 median: 72.5 (1%) max: 73 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612 min: 41 avg: 43 median: 41 (0%) max: 47 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
76440 Points (10%)
43224 Points (5%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 22.78 avg: 22.8 median: 22.8 (0%) max: 22.85 fps
14.3 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 8622 avg: 9428 median: 9192.5 (9%) max: 10698 Points
13095 Points (13%)
min: 9815 avg: 16853 median: 16853 (17%) max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2466 avg: 2689 median: 2629.5 (5%) max: 2911 Points
1751 Points (3%)
min: 1491 avg: 8575 median: 8575 (15%) max: 15659 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
2.4 Watt (1%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 114% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 92% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 616:
30 38 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
26 fps, max:
42 fps
40 ~ 36 fps
111%
Adreno 619L:
39 40 ~ 40 fps
Adreno 619L:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 619L:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
31 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 53 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
54 57 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.27.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
8 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 58 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
59 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.16.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
57 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
59 60 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.16.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
53 fps, max:
60 fps
60 [X] Oppo R17 Pro 1.18.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
1 fps, max:
60 fps
60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
30 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 60 ~ 50 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
26 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
12 fps, max:
31 fps
29 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.3.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
86%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 616:
22 [X] Lenovo Z5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
11 fps, max:
31 fps
27 29 [X] Nokia 8.1 1.3.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
29 29 [X] Oppo R17 Pro 1.5.4a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 2.2GHz
Adreno 616
min:
2 fps, max:
60 fps
29 30 30 ~ 28 fps
82%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 616 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619L → 109% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 110%
Qualcomm Adreno 619L low med. high ultra QHD 4K League of Legends: Wild Rift 60 PUBG Mobile 40 40 30 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 Real Racing 3 60 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 1 2 1
Qualcomm Adreno 612 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Armajet 30 PUBG Mobile 40 30 Shadow Fight 3 60 Dead Trigger 2 60 Asphalt 9: Legends 25 23 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2 2
Qualcomm Adreno 616 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 36 30 Arena of Valor 53 58 Shadow Fight 3 60 60 Dead Trigger 2 50 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 28 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 20. 05:05:35
#0 checking url part for id 9401 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10573 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.173s ... 0.174s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.174s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.174s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9401 +0.056s ... 0.229s
#9 got single benchmarks 9401 +0.047s ... 0.276s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10573 +0.002s ... 0.278s
#11 got single benchmarks 10573 +0.013s ... 0.291s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.002s ... 0.293s
#13 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.023s ... 0.316s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.316s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.162s ... 0.478s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.479s
#17 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.505s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.505s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.509s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.53s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.53s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.532s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)