Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 660 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 660

The Qualcomm Adreno 660 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SoC. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 660 GPU offers a 35% improved performance over the Adreno 650, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm also states that the energy efficiency improved by 20% which might be due to the new 5nm process at Samsung where the chip is produced.

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 619
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm7 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 02.12.2020 15.12.2015
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 660GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G8 x 1800 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G8 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 18 x 1804 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
200519 Points (23%)
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (6%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 3602     avg: 4041     median: 4118 (18%)     max: 4286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 3817     avg: 4280     median: 4298 (9%)     max: 4573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (6%)     max: 1499 Points
min: 5094     avg: 8458     median: 8757 (44%)     max: 9839 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2906     median: 2981.5 (15%)     max: 3107 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (3%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 7930     avg: 11518     median: 11676 (35%)     max: 12914 Points
min: 2412     avg: 2788     median: 2834 (8%)     max: 3008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 3959     avg: 5583     median: 5762 (3%)     max: 5925 Points
min: 635     avg: 1108     median: 1194.5 (1%)     max: 1227 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 974     avg: 1422     median: 1498 (2%)     max: 1564 Points
min: 189     avg: 327.8     median: 351 (0%)     max: 371 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 12     median: 12 (5%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
min: 19     avg: 26.8     median: 27 (5%)     max: 32 fps
min: 3.3     avg: 7.4     median: 7.7 (1%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
min: 39     avg: 69     median: 70.5 (5%)     max: 87 fps
min: 17     avg: 20.1     median: 21 (2%)     max: 23 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
min: 16     avg: 18.5     median: 19 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
min: 26     avg: 32.4     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
min: 33     avg: 45.4     median: 46 (3%)     max: 68 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 660
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
min: 55     avg: 87.8     median: 91 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (5%)
min: 65241     avg: 91217     median: 97281.5 (12%)     max: 102780 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
109.3 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 4055     avg: 4338     median: 4337.5 (1%)     max: 4620 Points
min: 1363     avg: 1377     median: 1377.5 (0%)     max: 1391 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 4370     avg: 4532     median: 4532 (1%)     max: 4694 Points
min: 1119     avg: 1168     median: 1160 (0%)     max: 1231 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (17%)     max: 23891 Points
53822 Points (54%)
min: 8763     avg: 23246     median: 25388 (25%)     max: 30058 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (15%)     max: 15659 Points
42266 Points (74%)
min: 3274     avg: 19611     median: 22384 (39%)     max: 28746 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 770% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 233% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Adreno 619:
30  fps
high
Adreno 660:
118  fps
Adreno 619:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
Adreno 660:
91  fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 619:
20 45 54 ~ 40 fps
med.
Adreno 619:
36  fps
ultra
Adreno 619:
20 28 30 ~ 26 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
240%
Adreno 660:
30 30 56 78 120 120 ~ 72 fps
200%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 30 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 77 86 89 90 95 98 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 612:
40  fps
168%
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 91 ~ 67 fps
98%
Adreno 619:
29 39 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 39 fps
med.
Adreno 660:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Adreno 619:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
180%
Adreno 660:
30 30 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 54 fps
103%
Adreno 619:
28 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 60 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Adreno 660:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
277%
Adreno 660:
166  fps
150%
Adreno 619:
60 60 93 115 121 ~ 90 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
240%
Adreno 660:
60  fps
120%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps
261%
Adreno 660:
59 60 60 ~ 60 fps
130%
Adreno 619:
30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 660:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 619:
90  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 660 → 228%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 212%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 134%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 134%

Qualcomm Adreno 619lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift3060
Genshin Impact403626
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile394031
Dead Trigger 290
Asphalt 9: Legends3030
Subway Surfers90
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

5


2


2
4
1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 660lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift6011860
Call of Duty Mobile9160
Armajet72
PUBG Mobile67605440
Dead Trigger 2166
Asphalt 9: Legends6060
Real Racing 360
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4


1

1
4
1

1
2






Qualcomm Adreno 612lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile4030
Shadow Fight 360
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends2523
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
2
2









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 23:34:53

#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10603 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.113s ... 0.114s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.114s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.114s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.04s ... 0.154s

#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.019s ... 0.173s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10603 +0.002s ... 0.175s

#11 got single benchmarks 10603 +0.073s ... 0.248s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0.002s ... 0.249s

#13 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.097s ... 0.347s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.347s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.173s ... 0.52s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.52s

#17 Got 224 rows for game benchmarks. +0.053s ... 0.573s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.573s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.578s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.026s ... 0.604s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.604s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.607s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)