, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 619

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 619

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 619 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is 60% better compared to the Adreno 612 graphics card and in our benchmarks on par with the 700 series cards.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 619
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 12.1DirectX 12.1
technology14 nm8 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 15.12.2015
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 619GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (4%)     max: 31129 Points
min: 54788     avg: 55662     median: 55911 (9%)     max: 56286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (13%)     max: 2344 Points
min: 3639     avg: 4001     median: 4098 (30%)     max: 4120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
min: 3842     avg: 4171     median: 4239 (10%)     max: 4298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (11%)     max: 1499 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2876     median: 2956 (30%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (4%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 2440     avg: 2734     median: 2802 (11%)     max: 2845 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 37     avg: 38.7     median: 37 (1%)     max: 42 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 619
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (2%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 19 (5%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 3.1     avg: 4.7     median: 4.9 (3%)     max: 5.6 fps
min: 9.9     avg: 12.8     median: 11 (7%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
min: 6.5     avg: 7.3     median: 7.4 (3%)     max: 7.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.6     median: 8.3 (4%)     max: 9.3 fps
min: 16     avg: 20.2     median: 17 (8%)     max: 33 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (2%)     max: 10 fps
min: 18     avg: 19.4     median: 20 (3%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 9.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 7     avg: 7.4     median: 7.1 (3%)     max: 8 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (1%)
min: 26.49     avg: 26.8     median: 26.8 (2%)     max: 27.04 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (17%)     max: 23891 Points
25388 Points (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (19%)     max: 15659 Points
20392 Points (45%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 220% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30 fps  fps
233%
Adreno 619:
60 fps 60 fps 89 fps ~ 70 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 612:
40 fps  fps
88%
Adreno 619:
29 fps 40 fps ~ 35 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30 fps  fps
100%
Adreno 619:
28 fps 30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60 fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60 fps  fps
202%
Adreno 619:
121 fps  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 612:
20 fps 30 fps ~ 25 fps
120%
Adreno 619:
30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
16 fps 30 fps ~ 23 fps
130%
Adreno 619:
30 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 619 → 145%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 88%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 06:23:00

#0 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10584 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:20:53 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.042s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.025s ... 0.067s

#8 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.013s ... 0.08s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10584 +0s ... 0.08s

#10 got single benchmarks 10584 +0.011s ... 0.091s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.103s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.103s

#14 Got 24 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.113s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.113s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.113s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.12s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.12s

#19 return log +0.072s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)