Qualcomm Adreno 512 vs Qualcomm Adreno 508 vs Qualcomm Adreno 540
Qualcomm Adreno 512 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
Qualcomm Adreno 508 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 508 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs".
Qualcomm Adreno 540 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 540 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 SoC for smartphones. It was introduced in early 2017 and can be found in high-end Android smartphones.
The integrated GPU is based on the optimized architecture of the Adreno 530 , but features clearly improved clock speeds (710 versus 624 MHz according to Anandtech ) and better thermal stability. This is also thanks to the new 10 nm process the Snapdragon 835 is produced in. In the reference smartphone from Qualcomm, the Adreno 540 is able to beat or perform at a similar level as the fastest smartphone graphics cards on the market (e.g. the ARM Mali-T880MP12 , ARM Mali-G71MP8 or Apple A10 GPU ). Therefore, it should be perfectly suited for demanding 3D gaming and also mobile VR and 4K displays.
Qualcomm Adreno 512 Qualcomm Adreno 508 Qualcomm Adreno 540 Adreno 500 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Adreno 500 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2 technology 14 nm 14 nm 10 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 08.05.2017 22.03.2017 Core Speed 650 MHz 710 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Adreno 540
1.3 pt (1%)
...
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 25561 avg: 28454 median: 29060 (3%) max: 29496 Points
min: 16508 avg: 18279 median: 18469 (2%) max: 18635 Points
min: 16794 avg: 53776 median: 56046.5 (7%) max: 58360 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
17290 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
2359 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
4259 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 451 avg: 452 median: 452 (0%) max: 453 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 508 avg: 513 median: 513 (1%) max: 518 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
17180 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1887 avg: 2062 median: 2120 (11%) max: 2161 Points
min: 1299 avg: 1379 median: 1391 (7%) max: 1415 Points
min: 3586 avg: 4690 median: 4956 (26%) max: 5269 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1734 avg: 1942 median: 2001 (5%) max: 2033 Points
min: 1204 avg: 1302 median: 1318 (3%) max: 1332 Points
min: 3682 avg: 5894 median: 6245.5 (15%) max: 6475 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1270 avg: 1400 median: 1432 (9%) max: 1442 Points
min: 872 avg: 904 median: 907 (6%) max: 919 Points
min: 2866 avg: 3801 median: 3840 (24%) max: 4101 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1134 avg: 1237 median: 1257 (1%) max: 1268 Points
min: 767 avg: 797 median: 801 (0%) max: 809 Points
min: 3324 avg: 4231 median: 4347 (2%) max: 4490 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 826 avg: 831 median: 831 (1%) max: 836 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 786 avg: 791 median: 791 (1%) max: 796 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 42 avg: 48.1 median: 48 (1%) max: 59 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508
min: 25 avg: 29.2 median: 29 (1%) max: 31 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 540
min: 54 avg: 60.3 median: 60 (2%) max: 79 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 43 avg: 48.4 median: 50 (0%) max: 51 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508 min: 29 avg: 29.7 median: 30 (0%) max: 30 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 540
min: 69 avg: 107 median: 111.5 (1%) max: 119 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 19 avg: 22.6 median: 21 (6%) max: 40 fps
min: 11 avg: 13.8 median: 14 (4%) max: 15 fps
min: 29 avg: 42.3 median: 40 (11%) max: 58 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20 avg: 22.1 median: 22.5 (1%) max: 23 fps
min: 13 avg: 13.9 median: 14 (1%) max: 14 fps
min: 43 avg: 55.2 median: 54 (3%) max: 64 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 4.7 avg: 5.7 median: 5.1 (1%) max: 10 fps
min: 2.7 avg: 3 median: 3.1 (1%) max: 3.2 fps
min: 8.9 avg: 12.9 median: 15 (3%) max: 16 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3 avg: 3.2 median: 3.2 (1%) max: 3.3 fps
min: 1.7 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (0%) max: 1.9 fps
min: 9.3 avg: 9.7 median: 9.7 (2%) max: 9.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 7.5 avg: 8.9 median: 8.1 (1%) max: 15 fps
min: 4.4 avg: 5.1 median: 5.2 (1%) max: 5.4 fps
min: 14 avg: 20.8 median: 24 (3%) max: 26 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.9 avg: 8.6 median: 8.6 (1%) max: 8.8 fps
min: 4.9 avg: 5.3 median: 5.3 (0%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 25 avg: 25.6 median: 26 (2%) max: 26 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 7.5 avg: 9.1 median: 8.6 (0%) max: 18 fps
min: 4.3 avg: 5.5 median: 5.4 (0%) max: 6 fps
min: 11 avg: 19.5 median: 15 (0%) max: 50 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8 avg: 8.8 median: 9 (0%) max: 9.1 fps
min: 5.3 avg: 5.5 median: 5.5 (0%) max: 5.6 fps
min: 22 avg: 24.5 median: 24 (0%) max: 26 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 38752 avg: 38763 median: 38762.5 (88%) max: 38773 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
44696 Points (99%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
12.8 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6741 avg: 13532 median: 6900 (7%) max: 26954 Points
8356 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2286 avg: 6896 median: 2290 (4%) max: 16113 Points
3409 Points (6%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100% n=15 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 63% n=15 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 540 → 251% n=15
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 512:
24 30 ~ 27 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
45 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 45 fps
52%
Adreno 508:
30 31 31 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
18 fps, max:
32 fps
31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
25 fps, max:
31 fps
31 ~ 31 fps
102%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.21.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
53 fps, max:
60 fps
62 ~ 61 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 60 [X] BlackBerry Key2 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
47 fps, max:
60 fps
60 ~ 50 fps
60%
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.23.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
22 fps, max:
31 fps
30 31 [X] CAT S61 1.24.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
122%
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.21.1.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
61 ~ 61 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
60 [X] BlackBerry Key2 1.11.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
25 fps, max:
60 fps
fps
63%
Adreno 508:
29 30 55 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.12.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
46 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 38 fps
75%
Adreno 540:
30 60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.9.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 45 fps
97%
Adreno 508:
56 [X] Sharp Aquos C10 1.12.5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
40 fps, max:
60 fps
58 59 ~ 58 fps
100%
Adreno 540:
60 60 [X] Nokia 8 Sirocco 1.9.4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
54 fps, max:
60 fps
~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
30 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
30 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
27 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
28 [X] Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 [X] Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 2.2GHz
Adreno 512
min:
26 fps, max:
30 fps
30 ~ 29 fps
100%
Adreno 512:
28 28 ~ 28 fps
107%
Adreno 508:
29 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Adreno 508:
25 28 30 [X] CAT S61 1.0.1a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 2.2GHz
Adreno 508
min:
15 fps, max:
31 fps
~ 28 fps
Adreno 540:
60 [X] Sony Xperia XZ1 5.6.0
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
min:
59 fps, max:
61 fps
fps
Adreno 508:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 540:
60 [X] LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) 2.5GHz
Adreno 540
fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 88% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 540 → 126% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 121%
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.22
log 08. 07:06:27
#0 checking url part for id 8778 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 8112 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7714 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Jun 2023 11:14:20 +0200 +0.049s ... 0.049s
#5 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.172s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.172s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.172s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8778 +0.049s ... 0.22s
#9 got single benchmarks 8778 +0.037s ... 0.257s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8112 +0.001s ... 0.259s
#11 got single benchmarks 8112 +0.025s ... 0.284s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7714 +0.019s ... 0.303s
#13 got single benchmarks 7714 +0.053s ... 0.356s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.356s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.198s ... 0.554s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.555s
#17 Got 122 rows for game benchmarks. +0.048s ... 0.602s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.602s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.008s ... 0.61s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.034s ... 0.644s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.644s
#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.646s
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)