Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 512 vs Qualcomm Adreno 504 vs Qualcomm Adreno 508

Qualcomm Adreno 512

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 512 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

 

Qualcomm Adreno 504

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 504 is a mobile graphics card for lower mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is 50% faster than the previous Adreno 308 in the Snapdragon 425.

In the Snapdragon 429, the Adreno 504 is manufactured in the modern 12nm process and should be very power efficient.

Qualcomm Adreno 508

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 508 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.

According to Qualcomm "up to 30% faster graphics rendering than previous designs". 

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 512Qualcomm Adreno 504Qualcomm Adreno 508
Adreno 500 Series
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
ArchitectureAdreno 500Adreno 500Adreno 500
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 30.06.2018 08.05.2017
Core Speed450 MHz650 MHz
CPU in Adreno 512GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6608 x 2200 MHz? MHz850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 504GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4294 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100+5 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 41004 x ? MHz320 MHz? MHz
min. - max.320 - ? MHz? - 850 MHz
CPU in Adreno 508GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6308 x 2200 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 25561     avg: 28454     median: 29060 (3%)     max: 29496 Points
min: 6895     avg: 6896     median: 6896 (1%)     max: 6897 Points
min: 16508     avg: 18279     median: 18469 (2%)     max: 18635 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1887     avg: 2062     median: 2120 (11%)     max: 2161 Points
min: 428     avg: 445     median: 445 (2%)     max: 462 Points
min: 1299     avg: 1379     median: 1391 (7%)     max: 1415 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1734     avg: 1942     median: 2001 (5%)     max: 2033 Points
min: 336     avg: 364.5     median: 364.5 (1%)     max: 393 Points
min: 1204     avg: 1302     median: 1318 (3%)     max: 1332 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1270     avg: 1400     median: 1432 (9%)     max: 1442 Points
257 Points (2%)
min: 872     avg: 904     median: 907 (6%)     max: 919 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1134     avg: 1237     median: 1257 (1%)     max: 1268 Points
210 Points (0%)
min: 767     avg: 797     median: 801 (0%)     max: 809 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 42     avg: 48.1     median: 48 (1%)     max: 59 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 504
17 fps (1%)
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508
min: 25     avg: 29.2     median: 29 (1%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 512
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 43     avg: 48.4     median: 50 (0%)     max: 51 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 504
11 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 508
min: 29     avg: 29.7     median: 30 (0%)     max: 30 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 19     avg: 22.6     median: 21 (6%)     max: 40 fps
min: 8.9     avg: 9.2     median: 9.2 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
min: 11     avg: 13.8     median: 14 (4%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22.1     median: 22.5 (1%)     max: 23 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
min: 13     avg: 13.9     median: 14 (1%)     max: 14 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 4.7     avg: 5.7     median: 5.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
2 fps (0%)
min: 2.7     avg: 3     median: 3.1 (1%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.3 fps
0.8 fps (0%)
min: 1.7     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (0%)     max: 1.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 7.5     avg: 8.9     median: 8.1 (1%)     max: 15 fps
min: 2     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (0%)     max: 3.1 fps
min: 4.4     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 5.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 7.9     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (1%)     max: 8.8 fps
min: 1.7     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.8 fps
min: 4.9     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (0%)     max: 5.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 7.5     avg: 9.1     median: 8.6 (0%)     max: 18 fps
min: 3.6     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (0%)     max: 3.8 fps
min: 4.3     avg: 5.5     median: 5.4 (0%)     max: 6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.8     median: 9 (0%)     max: 9.1 fps
1.8 fps (0%)
min: 5.3     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (0%)     max: 5.6 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
12.8 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 6741     avg: 13532     median: 6900 (7%)     max: 26954 Points
3898 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 2286     avg: 6896     median: 2290 (4%)     max: 16113 Points
860 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 27% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 63% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 512:
30  fps
77%
Adreno 504:
23  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 512:
24 30 ~ 27 fps
93%
Adreno 508:
25  fps
high
100%
Adreno 512:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 512:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 512:
60  fps
53%
Adreno 504:
32  fps
52%
Adreno 508:
30 31 31 31 31 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 512:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
62%
Adreno 504:
31  fps
60%
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 30 31 ~ 30 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 512:
60  fps
63%
Adreno 508:
29 30 55 ~ 38 fps
high
100%
Adreno 512:
60  fps
97%
Adreno 508:
56 58 59 ~ 58 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Adreno 508:
61  fps
high
Adreno 508:
61  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 512:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
120%
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 30 60 ~ 36 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 508:
30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 512:
28 29 30 ~ 29 fps
103%
Adreno 508:
28 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 512:
28 28 ~ 28 fps
25%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
107%
Adreno 508:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 512:
28 28 28 30 ~ 29 fps
24%
Adreno 504:
7  fps
97%
Adreno 508:
25 28 30 ~ 28 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 508:
32  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 508:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 512:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 512 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 504 → 48%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 508 → 88%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.22
log 05. 12:25:44

#0 checking url part for id 8778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9890 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8112 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:14:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.109s ... 0.11s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.11s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.11s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8778 +0.04s ... 0.15s

#9 got single benchmarks 8778 +0.034s ... 0.184s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9890 +0.001s ... 0.185s

#11 got single benchmarks 9890 +0.007s ... 0.192s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8112 +0.001s ... 0.193s

#13 got single benchmarks 8112 +0.024s ... 0.217s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.217s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.114s ... 0.331s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.332s

#17 Got 72 rows for game benchmarks. +0.026s ... 0.358s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.358s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.362s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.027s ... 0.389s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.389s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.391s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)