Qualcomm Adreno 509 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP2 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530
Qualcomm Adreno 509 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 509 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the lower end Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
ARM Mali-T880 MP2 ► remove from comparison
The ARM Mali-T880 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P20 SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.
Qualcomm Adreno 530 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets . It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.
The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430 , the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.
Qualcomm Adreno 509 ARM Mali-T880 MP2 Qualcomm Adreno 530 Adreno 500 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Midgard (4rd-gen) Shared Memory yes no yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1 DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP technology 14 nm 16 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2) OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1) Date of Announcement 08.05.2017 26.11.2015 15.12.2015 Codename Midgard (4th Generation) Pipelines 2 - unified Core Speed 900 (Boost) MHz 624 MHz Link to Manufacturer Page www.arm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 20610 avg: 20839 median: 20836 (2%) max: 21067 Points
min: 10023 avg: 13267 median: 13844 (2%) max: 14288 Points
min: 24310 avg: 32869 median: 32997 (4%) max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 6839 avg: 8665 median: 9269 (1%) max: 9283 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 10498 avg: 11431 median: 11898 (1%) max: 11898 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1525 avg: 1541 median: 1540 (7%) max: 1568 Points
min: 826 avg: 976 median: 991.5 (4%) max: 1069 Points
min: 2649 avg: 3348 median: 3425 (15%) max: 3806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1358 avg: 1395 median: 1400 (3%) max: 1406 Points
min: 767 avg: 882 median: 893.5 (2%) max: 978 Points
min: 3401 avg: 4503 median: 4661.5 (10%) max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 765 avg: 980 median: 1008 (5%) max: 1016 Points
min: 626 avg: 720 median: 717 (4%) max: 795 Points
min: 2252 avg: 2605 median: 2594.5 (13%) max: 2893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 645 avg: 841 median: 865 (3%) max: 872 Points
min: 556 avg: 620 median: 633 (2%) max: 647 Points
min: 2488 avg: 2996 median: 3108 (9%) max: 3253 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.2 (0%) max: 3.5 fps
1.5 fps (0%)
min: 7.1 avg: 8.4 median: 7.2 (1%) max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 5.4 avg: 5.9 median: 6 (0%) max: 6.1 fps
4.2 fps (0%)
min: 15 avg: 17.7 median: 19 (1%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
6.3 fps (1%)
min: 3.7 avg: 4 median: 4.1 (0%) max: 4.1 fps
min: 14 avg: 18.3 median: 19 (2%) max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.3 avg: 9.7 median: 10 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 3.4 avg: 6 median: 6.8 (0%) max: 6.9 fps
min: 12 avg: 28.6 median: 31 (1%) max: 34.02 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
16 fps (1%)
min: 9.6 avg: 10.5 median: 10.5 (1%) max: 11 fps
min: 26 avg: 43 median: 44.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 509 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 35 avg: 35.6 median: 36 (0%) max: 36 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2 min: 21 avg: 23.1 median: 24 (0%) max: 24 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19 avg: 83.3 median: 88 (1%) max: 96 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 9655 avg: 9936 median: 9935.5 (23%) max: 10216 Points
min: 21420 avg: 30602 median: 33028 (75%) max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 18345 avg: 19359 median: 19359 (43%) max: 20373 Points
min: 28538 avg: 37215 median: 38353 (85%) max: 41500 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 5536 avg: 5562 median: 5561.5 (6%) max: 5587 Points
min: 3868 avg: 3970 median: 3970 (4%) max: 4072 Points
min: 4781 avg: 5512 median: 5612.5 (6%) max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1582 avg: 1740 median: 1740 (3%) max: 1898 Points
min: 1046 avg: 1086 median: 1085.5 (2%) max: 1125 Points
min: 1913 avg: 2183 median: 2178.5 (4%) max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4410 Points (96%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 509 → 100% n=13 Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 67% n=13 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 257% n=13
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
Adreno 509:
25 25 ~ 25 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
57 59 ~ 58 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1.8GHz
Adreno 509
min:
28 fps, max:
31 fps
60 ~ 45 fps
102%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 57 ~ 46 fps
96%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 30 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
25 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
56 58 59 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
59 60 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 43 fps
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
30 [X] BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 1.8GHz
Adreno 509
min:
29 fps, max:
31 fps
fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
97%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 29 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 29 30 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 [X] ZTE Axon M Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
48 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
30 fps, max:
50 fps
~ 29 fps
100%
Adreno 509:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 530:
35 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
51 ~ 43 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 509 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 101% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 96% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 96%
Qualcomm Adreno 509 low med. high ultra QHD 4K PUBG Mobile 27 25 30 Arena of Valor 37 36 Shadow Fight 3 58 58 Dead Trigger 2 45 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 Asphalt 9: Legends 29 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 1 1 4 1
ARM Mali-T880 MP2 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 46 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 30 Temple Run 2 52 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 3
Qualcomm Adreno 530 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 43 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 29 Real Racing 3 60 43 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 18. 20:23:40
#0 checking url part for id 8782 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.131s ... 0.132s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.132s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.132s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8782 +0.045s ... 0.178s
#9 got single benchmarks 8782 +0.031s ... 0.209s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0.002s ... 0.211s
#11 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.04s ... 0.251s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0.002s ... 0.253s
#13 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.055s ... 0.308s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.308s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.041s ... 0.349s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.362s
#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.116s ... 0.478s
#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.478s
#19 Got 80 rows for game benchmarks. +0.032s ... 0.51s
#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.51s
#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.514s
#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.021s ... 0.535s
#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.535s
#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.538s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)