Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 505 vs ARM Mali-T880 MP2 vs ARM Mali-T830 MP2

Qualcomm Adreno 505

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 505 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 / 435 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth. Compared to the faster Adreno 506, the 505 is manufactured in the older 28nm process and offers less raw performance.

ARM Mali-T880 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T880 MP2

The ARM Mali-T880 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P20 SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2016 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2). The Mali-T880 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.

ARM Mali-T830 MP2

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T830 MP2

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the HiSilicon Kirin 650 in the beginning of 2016. The chip features two clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-450 MP4 and therefore non demanding Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP2 in the Kirin 650 is manufactured at TSMC at 16nm FF+ and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 505ARM Mali-T880 MP2ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Mali-T800 Series
Adreno 540 @ 0.71 GHz
Adreno 530 @ 0.62 GHz
Adreno 512
Adreno 510
Adreno 509
Adreno 508 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 506 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 505 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 504 @ 0.45 GHz
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
Mali-T880 MP12 12 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T880 MP4 4 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T880 MP2 2 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP2 2 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T830 MP1 1
ArchitectureAdreno 500Midgard (4rd-gen)
Core Speed450 MHz900 (Boost) MHz600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesnono
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2), OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.2
technology14 nm16 nm16 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11.2 (FL 11_2)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 26.11.2015 01.04.2016
CodenameMidgard (4th Generation)
Pipelines2 - unified2 - unified
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Adreno 505GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4398 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4358 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937)8 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T880 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio P258 x 2600 MHz1000 MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT67578 x 2300 MHz900 MHz? MHz
min. - max.900 - ? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T830 MP2GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 6598 x 2360 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 6588 x 2350 MHz900 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa8 x 1600 MHz700 MHz? MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.700 - ? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 7924     avg: 10477     median: 10069 (1%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 10023     avg: 13267     median: 13844 (2%)     max: 14288 Points
min: 5376     avg: 10021     median: 11147 (1%)     max: 11713 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
5627 Points (1%)
min: 6839     avg: 8665     median: 9269 (1%)     max: 9283 Points
min: 4548     avg: 6301     median: 6960 (1%)     max: 7395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
10835 Points (1%)
min: 10498     avg: 11431     median: 11898 (1%)     max: 11898 Points
8002 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 482     avg: 632     median: 603.5 (3%)     max: 835 Points
min: 826     avg: 976     median: 991.5 (4%)     max: 1069 Points
min: 465     avg: 594     median: 598 (3%)     max: 721 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 423     avg: 552     median: 529.5 (1%)     max: 735 Points
min: 767     avg: 882     median: 893.5 (2%)     max: 978 Points
min: 387     avg: 504     median: 509 (1%)     max: 618 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 0     avg: 371     median: 365 (2%)     max: 505 Points
min: 626     avg: 720     median: 717 (4%)     max: 795 Points
min: 297     avg: 398.3     median: 404 (2%)     max: 483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 0     avg: 309.7     median: 305 (1%)     max: 432 Points
min: 556     avg: 620     median: 633 (2%)     max: 647 Points
min: 241     avg: 327.9     median: 333 (1%)     max: 401 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.88     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (0%)     max: 1.2 fps
1.5 fps (0%)
min: 0.96     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 2.6     avg: 3.3     median: 3.6 (0%)     max: 3.7 fps
4.2 fps (0%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 2.1     avg: 2.7     median: 2.6 (0%)     max: 3.6 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 4     median: 4.1 (0%)     max: 4.1 fps
min: 1.8     avg: 2.7     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (0%)     max: 6.6 fps
min: 3.4     avg: 6     median: 6.8 (0%)     max: 6.9 fps
min: 1.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4.5 (0%)     max: 5.4 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 4.6     avg: 8     median: 7.1 (0%)     max: 19 fps
min: 9.6     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (1%)     max: 11 fps
min: 4.6     avg: 7.1     median: 7.9 (0%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 505
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 11     avg: 17.7     median: 17 (0%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T880 MP2
min: 21     avg: 23.1     median: 24 (0%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP2
min: 12     avg: 16.7     median: 18.5 (0%)     max: 20 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
33.5 fps (55%)
57.8 fps (95%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
8015 Points (18%)
min: 9655     avg: 9936     median: 9935.5 (23%)     max: 10216 Points
min: 8323     avg: 8545     median: 8542 (19%)     max: 8774 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 16486     avg: 16610     median: 16609.5 (37%)     max: 16733 Points
min: 18345     avg: 19359     median: 19359 (43%)     max: 20373 Points
min: 15988     avg: 16554     median: 16613 (37%)     max: 17001 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
5.2 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2589     avg: 3292     median: 3292 (3%)     max: 3995 Points
min: 3868     avg: 3970     median: 3970 (4%)     max: 4072 Points
min: 3565     avg: 3703     median: 3639 (4%)     max: 3967 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1032     avg: 1168     median: 1167.5 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
min: 1046     avg: 1086     median: 1085.5 (2%)     max: 1125 Points
min: 1076     avg: 1184     median: 1160.5 (2%)     max: 1339 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 143% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 102% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 505:
25  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 505:
24  fps
54%
Mali-T830 MP2:
13  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 505:
30 30 30 31 31 31 32 ~ 31 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
31 31 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 505:
30 30 30 30 30 30 32 ~ 30 fps
97%
Mali-T830 MP2:
26 31 31 ~ 29 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 505:
42 47 47 58 ~ 49 fps
high
100%
Adreno 505:
41 46 47 58 ~ 48 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 505:
30 30 30 30 30 30 50 52 53 54 ~ 39 fps
118%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 52 57 ~ 46 fps
103%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 35 49 51 52 56 57 58 ~ 40 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 505:
29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T880 MP2:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-T830 MP2:
29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 505:
19 19 24 25 27 27 30 30 30 ~ 26 fps
115%
Mali-T880 MP2:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
92%
Mali-T830 MP2:
16 18 22 22 22 23 25 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 ~ 24 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 505:
27 29 29 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Adreno 505:
12 19 21 24 27 ~ 21 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Mali-T830 MP2:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 505:
60  fps
87%
Mali-T880 MP2:
52  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Mali-T830 MP2:
58  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 505 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T880 MP2 → 105%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP2 → 91%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 101%

Qualcomm Adreno 505lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile2524
Arena of Valor3130
Shadow Fight 34948
Dead Trigger 239
Asphalt 8: Airborne3026
Asphalt 9: Legends2921
Temple Run 260
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		2
3

1


2
2
1

1







ARM Mali-T830 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile13
Arena of Valor3129
Dead Trigger 240
Asphalt 8: Airborne3024
Real Racing 326
Subway Surfers58
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2

1


2
2

1








ARM Mali-T880 MP2lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Dead Trigger 246
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





3










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 18. 20:29:29

#0 checking url part for id 7444 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7720 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7310 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.125s ... 0.126s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.126s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.126s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7444 +0.042s ... 0.168s

#9 got single benchmarks 7444 +0.1s ... 0.268s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7720 +0.002s ... 0.271s

#11 got single benchmarks 7720 +0.035s ... 0.305s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7310 +0.002s ... 0.307s

#13 got single benchmarks 7310 +0.049s ... 0.356s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.356s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.166s ... 0.522s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.522s

#17 Got 120 rows for game benchmarks. +0.042s ... 0.565s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.565s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.569s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.592s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.592s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.594s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)