, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 302

Qualcomm Adreno 320

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 320 is a GPU for smartphones and tablets that is integrated into Qualcomm SoCs. It was introduced in the end of 2012 and was primarily used for Android devices. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. 

The Adreno 320 has Unified Shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0. The performance compared to the Adreno 200-series is supposed to be improved by the factor 3-4. 

The Adreno 320 is used in Snapdragon S4 SoCs like the AQP8064.

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

Qualcomm Adreno 320Qualcomm Adreno 302
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 compare 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines16 - unified6 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 9_3DirectX 9.3
technology28 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement27.02.2012 20.06.2013
CPU in Adreno 320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T4 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A4 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960DT2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 400 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 10423     avg: 10644     median: 10644 (2%)     max: 10865 Points
min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (1%)     max: 3678 Points
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
min: 9.4     avg: 11.7     median: 11.9 (0%)     max: 13.3 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
4.3 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
8.5 fps (2%)
min: 5     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (2%)     max: 6.8 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0
3180 Points (24%)
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4700     avg: 5400     median: 5400 (12%)     max: 6100 Points
1316 Points (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 10600     avg: 11550     median: 11550 (26%)     max: 12500 Points
3442 Points (8%)
49.7 fps (74%)
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (2%)     max: 2780 Points
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 56% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
24.6 1920 x 1080  fps
Fifa 14 Mobile Android

Fifa 14 Mobile Android

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
29 1280 x 720 29.8 1920 x 1080 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 320:
24.8 1280x720 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 320:
26 1280x720 fps 27.2 1920 x 1080 ~ 27 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 320:
44 1280x720 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 320:
21 1280x720 fps  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
55 1280x720 fps  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 320:
58 1280x720  fps
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

2011
low
100%
Adreno 320:
20 1280x720 fps  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 04:50:55

#0 checking url part for id 3557 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.045s ... 0.045s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.046s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3557 +0.028s ... 0.074s

#8 got single benchmarks 3557 +0.021s ... 0.095s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0s ... 0.095s

#10 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.013s ... 0.108s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.108s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.122s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.122s

#14 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.134s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.134s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.135s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.141s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.141s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.144s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)