Qualcomm Adreno 320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 302

Qualcomm Adreno 320

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 320 is a GPU for smartphones and tablets that is integrated into Qualcomm SoCs. It was introduced in the end of 2012 and was primarily used for Android devices. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. 

The Adreno 320 has Unified Shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0. The performance compared to the Adreno 200-series is supposed to be improved by the factor 3-4. 

The Adreno 320 is used in Snapdragon S4 SoCs like the AQP8064.

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 320Qualcomm Adreno 302
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 (compare) 32 @ 450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 308 (compare) 6
Adreno 306 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 305 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 304 (compare) 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 330 (compare) 32 @ 450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 308 (compare) 6
Adreno 306 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 305 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 304 (compare) 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 400 MHz
16 - 6 -
Core400 MHz400 MHz
yesyes
DirectXDirectX 9_3DirectX 9.3
Technology28 nm28 nm
Introduced27.02.2012 20.06.2013
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T4 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A4 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960DT2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.400 - 400 MHz? - ? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 10423     avg: 10644     median: 10644 (2%)     max: 10865 Points
min: 3543     avg: 3599.3     median: 3592 (1%)     max: 3678 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 4928     avg: 5903.3     median: 5689 (1%)     max: 7322 Points
min: 1951     avg: 1991.1     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 8859     avg: 10626.9     median: 10616 (1%)     max: 12167 Points
min: 4095     avg: 4219.4     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Offscreen Fixed Time 1920x1080
min: 16     avg: 27.3     median: 28 (5%)     max: 35 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Fixed Time
min: 19     avg: 30.3     median: 31 (52%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
4.3 fps (1%)
1.3 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
8.5 fps (2%)
min: 5     avg: 5.9     median: 5 (1%)     max: 6 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0 1024x2048
3180 Points (24%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Off-screen 1024x2048
min: 1618     avg: 2029.2     median: 2080 (72%)     max: 2511 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating
min: 3555     avg: 5150.6     median: 5391 (47%)     max: 6115 Points
AnTuTu v3 - GPU
min: 5474     avg: 7422.5     median: 7324 (76%)     max: 9072
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
min: 34     avg: 47.1     median: 45 (75%)     max: 60 fps
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.0 - Off-Screen
min: 5     avg: 7     median: 6 (29%)     max: 8 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 4700     avg: 5400     median: 5400 (12%)     max: 6100 fps
1316 fps (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 10600     avg: 11550     median: 11550 (26%)     max: 12500 fps
3442 fps (8%)
NenaMark2
min: 59     avg: 59.9     median: 59 (88%)     max: 61 fps
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1880     avg: 2327.5     median: 2421 (11%)     max: 2778 Points
min: 2172     avg: 2356.4     median: 2297 (11%)     max: 2780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 737     avg: 949.3     median: 935 (15%)     max: 1179 Points
min: 540     avg: 574.2     median: 584 (9%)     max: 591 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
min: 2049     avg: 3031.9     median: 3024 (66%)     max: 4213 points
min: 2536     avg: 2655.5     median: 2655 (58%)     max: 2775 points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 54%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
24.6 1920 x 1080  fps
Adreno 320:
»
Fifa 14 Mobile Android

Fifa 14 Mobile Android

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
29 1280 x 720 29.8 1920 x 1080 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 320:
»
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 320:
24.8 1280x720 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 320:
26 1280x720 fps 27.2 1920 x 1080 ~ 27 fps
Adreno 320:
»
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 320:
44 1280x720 fps  fps
high
100%
Adreno 320:
21 1280x720 fps  fps
Adreno 320:
»
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 320:
55 1280x720 fps  fps
Adreno 320:
»
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 320:
58 1280x720  fps
Adreno 320:
»
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

2011
low
100%
Adreno 320:
20 1280x720 fps  fps
Adreno 320:
»

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)