Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 304 vs Qualcomm Adreno 308 vs Qualcomm Adreno 320

Qualcomm Adreno 304

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 304 is an entry-level integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 series (e. g. MSM8909).

The Adreno 304 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.

As all other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 304 includes 24 ALUs (6 in other sources) that are built as unified shaders. More information on the architecture can be found on Github.

Qualcomm Adreno 308

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 308

The Qualcomm Adreno 308 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425-series. Like the other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 308 most likely also features 24 ALUs (unified shaders). More information on the architecture of the A3xx series can be found on github.com.

Qualcomm Adreno 320

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 320 is a GPU for smartphones and tablets that is integrated into Qualcomm SoCs. It was introduced in the end of 2012 and was primarily used for Android devices. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. 

The Adreno 320 has Unified Shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0. The performance compared to the Adreno 200-series is supposed to be improved by the factor 3-4. 

The Adreno 320 is used in Snapdragon S4 SoCs like the AQP8064.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 304Qualcomm Adreno 308Qualcomm Adreno 320
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified6 - unified16 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9_3, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement01.07.2015 11.02.2016 27.02.2012
FeaturesOpen CL 1.1e, Renderscript
CPU in Adreno 304GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80094 x 1300 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM89094 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 31004 x ? MHz200 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm 2052 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.200 - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 308GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)4 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 2154 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T4 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A4 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960DT2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.400 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2359     avg: 3958     median: 4053 (0%)     max: 5042 Points
min: 2546     avg: 5280     median: 5461.5 (1%)     max: 5778 Points
min: 10423     avg: 10644     median: 10644 (1%)     max: 10865 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 2076     avg: 2214     median: 2219.5 (0%)     max: 2341 Points
min: 4928     avg: 5903     median: 5689 (1%)     max: 7322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4189     avg: 4699     median: 4851 (1%)     max: 4906 Points
min: 8859     avg: 10627     median: 10616 (1%)     max: 12167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
162 Points (1%)
min: 145     avg: 288.3     median: 295 (2%)     max: 354 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
135 Points (0%)
min: 118     avg: 243.6     median: 248 (1%)     max: 301 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 27.3     median: 28.5 (5%)     max: 35 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 19     avg: 30.3     median: 31 (52%)     max: 37 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 304
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.24     avg: 10.5     median: 9.6 (0%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 308
min: 6.4     avg: 13.2     median: 13 (0%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
min: 9.8     avg: 15.4     median: 14 (0%)     max: 26.6 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 304
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 3     avg: 4.7     median: 5.2 (0%)     max: 5.6 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 308
min: 3.4     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (0%)     max: 7.8 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 320
min: 8.3     avg: 12.9     median: 13 (0%)     max: 16.5 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 3.8     avg: 6.2     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.6 (2%)     max: 11 fps
8.5 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.9 fps
min: 1.3     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 3 fps
4.3 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0
3180 Points (24%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 1618     avg: 2029     median: 2080 (72%)     max: 2511 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 3555     avg: 5151     median: 5391 (47%)     max: 6115 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 5474     avg: 7422     median: 7324 (76%)     max: 9072 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 34.79     avg: 47.1     median: 45.8 (76%)     max: 60.6 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 5.836     avg: 7     median: 6.8 (32%)     max: 8.298 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
0 Points (0%)
min: 10600     avg: 11550     median: 11550 (26%)     max: 12500 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 4700     avg: 5400     median: 5400 (12%)     max: 6100 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 59     avg: 59.9     median: 59.8 (89%)     max: 61.3 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1880     avg: 2327     median: 2421 (2%)     max: 2778 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 737     avg: 949     median: 935 (2%)     max: 1179 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
3241 Points (70%)
min: 2049     avg: 3032     median: 3024.5 (66%)     max: 4213 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 304 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 140% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 218% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 308:
22  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 308:
30 31 31 ~ 31 fps
ultra
Adreno 308:
28 30 31 ~ 30 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 308:
29 41.5 47 ~ 39 fps
high
Adreno 308:
34.5 39 ~ 37 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 308:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 320:
24.6 1920 x 1080  fps
Fifa 14 Mobile Android

Fifa 14 Mobile Android

2013
high
Adreno 320:
29 1280 x 720 29.8 1920 x 1080 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 304:
21  fps
143%
Adreno 308:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
118%
Adreno 320:
24.8 1280x720  fps
high
100%
Adreno 304:
13  fps
138%
Adreno 308:
18 18 ~ 18 fps
208%
Adreno 320:
26 1280x720 27.2 1920 x 1080 ~ 27 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 304:
42  fps
117%
Adreno 308:
49  fps
105%
Adreno 320:
44 1280x720  fps
high
100%
Adreno 304:
20  fps
135%
Adreno 308:
27  fps
105%
Adreno 320:
21 1280x720  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 308:
54  fps
Adreno 320:
55 1280x720  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 320:
58 1280x720  fps
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

2011
low
Adreno 320:
20 1280x720  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 304 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 133%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 320 → 134%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 105%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.22
log 21. 21:57:19

#0 checking url part for id 6449 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3557 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Mar 2023 13:23:48 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.115s ... 0.116s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.116s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.116s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6449 +0.038s ... 0.154s

#9 got single benchmarks 6449 +0.045s ... 0.199s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7906 +0.001s ... 0.2s

#11 got single benchmarks 7906 +0.044s ... 0.244s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3557 +0.001s ... 0.245s

#13 got single benchmarks 3557 +0.029s ... 0.275s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.275s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.048s ... 0.323s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.325s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.328s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.33s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.351s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.352s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.353s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.355s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.356s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.357s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.358s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.36s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.367s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.375s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.375s

#30 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.018s ... 0.393s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.393s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.397s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.42s

#34 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.42s

#35 return log +0.002s ... 0.422s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)