Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 304 vs Qualcomm Adreno 308 vs Qualcomm Adreno 305

Qualcomm Adreno 304

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 304 is an entry-level integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 series (e. g. MSM8909).

The Adreno 304 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.

As all other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 304 includes 24 ALUs (6 in other sources) that are built as unified shaders. More information on the architecture can be found on Github.

Qualcomm Adreno 308

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 308

The Qualcomm Adreno 308 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425-series. Like the other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 308 most likely also features 24 ALUs (unified shaders). More information on the architecture of the A3xx series can be found on github.com.

Qualcomm Adreno 305

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 305 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400- an S4 Plus-series (e. g. 8930AB, Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3). The Adreno 305 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 304Qualcomm Adreno 308Qualcomm Adreno 305
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified6 - unified6 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz450 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement01.07.2015 11.02.2016 01.09.2012
FeaturesOpen CL 1.1e, Renderscript
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/proce...
CPU in Adreno 304GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80094 x 1300 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM89094 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 31004 x ? MHz200 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm 2052 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.200 - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 308GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)4 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 2154 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 305GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89284 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80284 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB2 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 6 more
min. - max.? - 450 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2359     avg: 3958     median: 4053 (0%)     max: 5042 Points
min: 2546     avg: 5280     median: 5461.5 (1%)     max: 5778 Points
min: 3503     avg: 4146     median: 4210 (0%)     max: 4402 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 2076     avg: 2214     median: 2219.5 (0%)     max: 2341 Points
min: 1780     avg: 2534     median: 2429 (0%)     max: 5435 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4189     avg: 4699     median: 4851 (1%)     max: 4906 Points
min: 3035     avg: 4947     median: 5238.5 (1%)     max: 5521 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
162 Points (1%)
min: 145     avg: 288.3     median: 295 (2%)     max: 354 Points
209 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
135 Points (0%)
min: 118     avg: 243.6     median: 248 (1%)     max: 301 Points
173 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 8.2     avg: 13.4     median: 13.5 (2%)     max: 17 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 21     avg: 26.7     median: 27 (45%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 304
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.24     avg: 10.5     median: 9.6 (0%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 308
min: 6.4     avg: 13.2     median: 13 (0%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 305
min: 5.6     avg: 10.9     median: 10.8 (0%)     max: 15.5 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 304
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 3     avg: 4.7     median: 5.2 (0%)     max: 5.6 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 308
min: 3.4     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (0%)     max: 7.8 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 305
min: 3.5     avg: 5.3     median: 5.7 (0%)     max: 6.2 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
min: 3.8     avg: 6.2     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 16 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.6 (2%)     max: 11 fps
min: 1.7     avg: 4.3     median: 3.9 (1%)     max: 6.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.9 fps
min: 1.3     avg: 2.7     median: 2.8 (0%)     max: 3 fps
min: 1.2     avg: 2     median: 1.7 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 756     avg: 1724     median: 1840 (64%)     max: 2156 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 3291     avg: 3821     median: 3867.5 (34%)     max: 4216 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 4234     avg: 4944     median: 4983 (52%)     max: 5498 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.58     avg: 35.6     median: 34.9 (58%)     max: 48.99 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 2.265     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (13%)     max: 3.092 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
0 Points (0%)
min: 3492     avg: 4252     median: 4267 (9%)     max: 4725 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 749     avg: 1438     median: 1433.5 (3%)     max: 1878 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 54.3     avg: 58.5     median: 58.7 (87%)     max: 64.6 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1801     avg: 2413     median: 2406 (2%)     max: 3026 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 516     avg: 702     median: 705.5 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
3241 Points (70%)
min: 1651     avg: 3146     median: 3132 (68%)     max: 4046 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 304 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 152% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 109% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 308:
22  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Adreno 305:
35  fps
high
Adreno 305:
22  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 308:
30 31 31 ~ 31 fps
Adreno 305:
30  fps
ultra
Adreno 308:
28 30 31 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 305:
29  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 308:
29 41.5 47 ~ 39 fps
Adreno 305:
27  fps
high
Adreno 308:
34.5 39 ~ 37 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Adreno 305:
36  fps
high
Adreno 305:
34  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 308:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
Adreno 305:
29  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 304:
21  fps
143%
Adreno 308:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
138%
Adreno 305:
29 1280x720  fps
high
100%
Adreno 304:
13  fps
138%
Adreno 308:
18 18 ~ 18 fps
169%
Adreno 305:
18 26 1280x720 ~ 22 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 304:
42  fps
117%
Adreno 308:
49  fps
100%
Adreno 305:
42 1280x720  fps
high
100%
Adreno 304:
20  fps
135%
Adreno 308:
27  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 308:
54  fps
Adreno 305:
60 720x1280  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 305:
55 720x1085  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 304 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 133%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 136%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.22
log 24. 13:51:56

#0 checking url part for id 6449 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Mar 2023 13:23:52 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.104s ... 0.106s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.106s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.106s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6449 +0.039s ... 0.145s

#9 got single benchmarks 6449 +0.047s ... 0.191s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7906 +0.001s ... 0.192s

#11 got single benchmarks 7906 +0.047s ... 0.239s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0.001s ... 0.241s

#13 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.08s ... 0.321s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.321s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.057s ... 0.377s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.38s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.382s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.385s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.025s ... 0.41s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.411s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.413s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.414s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.415s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.416s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.418s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.419s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.425s

#28 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.433s

#29 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.434s

#30 Got 39 rows for game benchmarks. +0.022s ... 0.455s

#31 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.455s

#32 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.459s

#33 benchmarks composed for output. +0.025s ... 0.484s

#34 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.484s

#35 return log +0.002s ... 0.486s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)