Qualcomm Adreno 302 vs Qualcomm Adreno 330

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

Qualcomm Adreno 330

► remove Qualcomm Adreno 330

The Qualcomm Adreno 330 is a GPU for smartphones and tablets that is integrated into Qualcomm SoCs. It was introduced in the middle of 2013 and was primarily used for Android devices. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" switch between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. It supports OpenGL ES 3.0 and is mostly used in Android based smartphones and tablets.

The graphics clock rate of the Adreno 330 differs from the used SoC where it is built in. It ranges from 450 MHz in the Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, over 550 MHz in the MSM8974AB up to 578 MHz in the Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC. In addition, there are some architectural changes compared to the former Adreno 320 (e.g. more shader cores).

As a high-end GPU (in 2013) for Android based SoCs, the Adreno 330 is able to cope with even demanding games and high resolution displays. As you can see in our tests benchmarks below, the performance is similar to the PowerVR G6430 in the Apple A7 SoC.

We tested a Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 with a 450 MHz clocked Adreno 330 in a Acer Liquid S2 (see our review). The games run in 1920x1080 on this phablet and are therefore quite demanding.

Real Racing 3 was running quite good on some tracks in "high" settings (set with RR3 Graphics App) and stuttering on other tracks with many cars visible. In medium settings it ran fluently all the time. However battery consumption (25% in 3 races with a total runtime of 45 min) and heat development (max 42°C = 108°F) were quite high.

Fifa 14 and Angry Birds Go were also well playable although there was some slight stuttering visible in both games (may be caused by the game itself). Angry Birds Go also felt like running most of the times in lower fps regions.

The older but still demanding GTA 3 was no problem for the Liquid S2 as were less demanding games like Subway Surf or Temple Run 2. Especially the later two ran in high fps regions.

Qualcomm Adreno 302Qualcomm Adreno 330
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 32 @ 450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
Adreno 320 (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 308 (compare) 6
Adreno 306 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 305 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 304 (compare) 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
Adreno 320 (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 308 (compare) 6
Adreno 306 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 305 (compare) 6 @ 450 MHz
Adreno 304 (compare) 6 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 400 MHz
6 - 32 -
Core400 MHz450 - 578 (Boost) MHz
yesyes
DirectXDirectX 9.3DirectX 9_3
Technology28 nm28 nm
Introduced20.06.2013 07.01.2013
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - ? MHz? - ? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 3543     avg: 3599.3     median: 3592 (1%)     max: 3678 Points
min: 10153     avg: 17810.1     median: 18007 (3%)     max: 22684 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 1951     avg: 1991.1     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
min: 7283     avg: 9050.6     median: 9118 (1%)     max: 10768 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 4095     avg: 4219.4     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
min: 10184     avg: 15992.4     median: 17935 (2%)     max: 21680 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
974 Points (7%)
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
1030 Points (4%)
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
0 Points (0%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Offscreen Fixed Time 1920x1080
min: 34     avg: 59.1     median: 59 (11%)     max: 69 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Fixed Time
min: 37     avg: 49.6     median: 51 (85%)     max: 54 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 330
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 330
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
1.3 fps (0%)
min: 8     avg: 10.5     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
min: 5     avg: 5.9     median: 5 (1%)     max: 6 fps
min: 4     avg: 11.4     median: 11 (3%)     max: 26 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
0 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - 3DRating V4.0 for OpenGL ES 2.0 1024x2048
min: 4826     avg: 5231     median: 5231 (39%)     max: 5636 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating
10143 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v3 - GPU
9637 (100%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
34.3 fps (57%)
min: 43     avg: 58.6     median: 59 (98%)     max: 60 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Off-Screen
min: 11     avg: 14.1     median: 14 (67%)     max: 15 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
1316 fps (3%)
min: 8851     avg: 11510.2     median: 11943 (27%)     max: 12943 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
3442 fps (8%)
min: 17913     avg: 22815.1     median: 23230 (52%)     max: 25299 fps
NenaMark2
49.7 fps (74%)
min: 58     avg: 59.7     median: 59 (88%)     max: 60 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2172     avg: 2356.4     median: 2297 (11%)     max: 2780 Points
min: 1829     avg: 3304.4     median: 3382 (16%)     max: 4122 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 540     avg: 574.2     median: 584 (9%)     max: 591 Points
min: 786     avg: 1326.1     median: 1242 (20%)     max: 2061 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2655.5     median: 2655 (58%)     max: 2775 points
min: 3414     avg: 4238.3     median: 4354 (95%)     max: 4568 points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 330 → 306%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Adreno 330:
34  fps
Adreno 330:
»
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 330:
27 2392 x 1440 30 32 1920 x 1080 fps ~ 30 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Fifa 14 Mobile Android

Fifa 14 Mobile Android

2013
high
Adreno 330:
29 2392 x 1440 29.4 1920 x 1080 ~ 29 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 330:
28 2392 x 1440  fps
high
Adreno 330:
27.7 2392 x 1440 fps 28 1920 x 1080 28 29 1920x1080 ~ 28 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Gangstar Vegas

Gangstar Vegas

2013
ultra
Adreno 330:
16 2392 x 1440  fps 20.3 1920 x 1080 ~ 18 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 330:
23 2392 x 1440 fps 28.5 1920x1080  fps ~ 26 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Adreno 330:
58  59 1440 x 2406 fps 59 1920x1080 ~ 59 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 330:
49 1440 x 2406 56 1920x1080  fps ~ 53 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

Grand Theft Auto 3 Android

2011
low
Adreno 330:
24.5 2392 x 1440 27 1920 x 1080 ~ 26 fps
Adreno 330:
»
Minecraft - Pocket Edition

Minecraft - Pocket Edition

2011
ultra
Adreno 330:
45 2392 x 1440 57.9 1920 x 1080 ~ 51 fps
Adreno 330:
»

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)