Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 225 vs Qualcomm Adreno 205

Qualcomm Adreno 225

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 225 is an integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs of the Snapdragon S4 line. It is mostly used for Android based smartphones and tablets. It offers 8 SIMDs with 4 MADs per SIMD and is rated at 25.6 GFLPS at 400 MHz.

Compared to the Adreno 220, the 225 offers Direct3D 9_3 support and is higher clocked at 400 versus 266 MHz. 

Qualcomm Adreno 205

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 205 is an integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs (e.g. MSM7x30, MSM8x55, or APQ8055 SoCs). It is mostly used for Android based smartphones and tablets and is situated in the entry-level. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 2.0 and OpenVG 1.1. The GPU uses a 5-way VLIW (4x ALU) architecture and is capable of 57 M triangles/s and 539M pixel/s at 245 MHz clock rate.

Source: Wikipedia

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 225Qualcomm Adreno 205
Adreno 200 Series
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 compare 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 compare 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified4 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz245 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 2.0OpenGL ES 2.0
technology45 nm45 nm
Date of Announcement27.02.2012 06.09.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.qualcomm.com/discover/...
CPU in Adreno 225GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A2 x 1500 MHz266 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89602 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.266 - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 205GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM82551 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
4969 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
2706 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
5402 Points (1%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 6.5     avg: 9.7     median: 10 (2%)     max: 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 13     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (28%)     max: 25 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.9     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (0%)     max: 6.3 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.9     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.6 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 28.25     avg: 38.6     median: 38.5 (64%)     max: 49.14 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 5989     avg: 6046     median: 6045.5 (13%)     max: 6102 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 58.8     avg: 59.5     median: 59.9 (89%)     max: 60.1 fps
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2487     avg: 2839     median: 2776.5 (60%)     max: 3314 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 225 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 17:34:10

#0 checking url part for id 3142 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2956 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.047s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3142 +0.029s ... 0.077s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.078s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#17 got single benchmarks 3142 +0.01s ... 0.09s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 2956 +0s ... 0.09s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#21 got single benchmarks 2956 +0.004s ... 0.094s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.094s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.099s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.1s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.101s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#54 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.101s

#55 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.101s

#56 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.105s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.052s ... 0.157s

#58 return log +0.003s ... 0.16s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)