Qualcomm Adreno 205 vs Qualcomm Adreno 225 vs Qualcomm Adreno 203

Qualcomm Adreno 205

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 205 is an integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs (e.g. MSM7x30, MSM8x55, or APQ8055 SoCs). It is mostly used for Android based smartphones and tablets and is situated in the entry-level. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 2.0 and OpenVG 1.1. The GPU uses a 5-way VLIW (4x ALU) architecture and is capable of 57 M triangles/s and 539M pixel/s at 245 MHz clock rate.

Source: Wikipedia

Qualcomm Adreno 225

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 225 is an integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs of the Snapdragon S4 line. It is mostly used for Android based smartphones and tablets. It offers 8 SIMDs with 4 MADs per SIMD and is rated at 25.6 GFLPS at 400 MHz.

Compared to the Adreno 220, the 225 offers Direct3D 9_3 support and is higher clocked at 400 versus 266 MHz. 

Qualcomm Adreno 203

► remove

The Qualcomm Adreno 203 is an integrated graphics card in ARM based SoCs (e.g. MSM8225Q or 8625Q). It is mostly used for Android based smartphones and tablets and is situated in the entry-level. The GPU supports OpenGL ES 2.0 and OpenVG 1.1. Compared to the Adreno 200, the 203 offers twice the amount of shaders (4x ALU).

Qualcomm Adreno 205Qualcomm Adreno 225Qualcomm Adreno 203
ManufacturerQualcommQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 200 Series
Adreno 225 8 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 220 8 @ 266 MHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 203 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 200 2 @ 128 MHz
Adreno 225 8 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 220 8 @ 266 MHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 203 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 200 2 @ 128 MHz
Adreno 225 8 @ 400 MHz
Adreno 220 8 @ 266 MHz
Adreno 205 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 203 4 @ 245 MHz
Adreno 200 2 @ 128 MHz
4 - 8 - 4 -
Core245 MHz400 MHz245 MHz
yesyesyes
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
Introduced06.09.2010 27.02.2012 26.09.2012
Manufacturerhttps://developer.qualcomm.com/discover/...https://developer.qualcomm.com/discover/...
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM82551 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
4969 Points (1%)
2073 Points (0%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
2706 Points (0%)
min: 1131     avg: 1348     median: 1342 (0%)     max: 1576 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
5402 Points (1%)
min: 2269     avg: 2584.8     median: 2333 (0%)     max: 3029 Points
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Offscreen Fixed Time 1920x1080
min: 6     avg: 9.7     median: 10 (2%)     max: 12 fps
min: 3     avg: 4.4     median: 3 (1%)     max: 5 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 - Egypt HD Fixed Time
min: 13     avg: 17.2     median: 16 (27%)     max: 25 fps
min: 6     avg: 8.8     median: 7 (12%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Qualcomm Adreno 203
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 203
AnTuTu 3DRating - Off-screen 1024x2048
min: 1184     avg: 1235.2     median: 1194 (41%)     max: 1329 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating
min: 1976     avg: 2097.4     median: 2125 (19%)     max: 2144 Points
AnTuTu v3 - GPU
min: 2365     avg: 2499.8     median: 2416 (25%)     max: 2792
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
min: 28     avg: 38.6     median: 38 (63%)     max: 49 fps
min: 14     avg: 18.9     median: 18 (30%)     max: 24 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 5989     avg: 6045.5     median: 6045 (13%)     max: 6102 fps
NenaMark2
min: 58     avg: 59.5     median: 59 (88%)     max: 60 fps
min: 28     avg: 32.9     median: 31 (46%)     max: 40 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1516     avg: 1720.3     median: 1764 (8%)     max: 1836 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 451     avg: 550.5     median: 563 (9%)     max: 624 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
min: 2487     avg: 2838.5     median: 2776 (60%)     max: 3314 points
min: 1725     avg: 1889.7     median: 1858 (40%)     max: 2183 points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 225 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 203 → 64%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)