Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A9 vs Apple A8 vs Apple A8X

Apple A9

► remove from comparison Apple A9

The Apple A9 is a high-end dual-core ARM SoC for smartphones. It was announced in Sept. 2015 in the new iPhone 6s and 6s Plus. Technical details were not published, but the CPU part should be about 70% and the GPU 90% faster than the previous Apple A8. Therefore, the performance should be on par with high-end Android SoCs in 2015.

It is based on the third generation of Apples 64 Bit architectures (Cyclone 3?) and uses a "new transistor technology". It is manufactured at Samsung in 14nm (slightly smaller die) and TSMC at 16nm (both FINFET 3D transistors). A performance difference of both versions are not noticable.

Furthermore, the chip now integrates the M9 motion coprocessor and a 4K video de- and encoder (as the iPhones 6s supports 4K video recording). The integrated graphics card should be still based on PowerVR technology.

The power consumption could be lower than the A8 due to the new process technology and the fact that the iPhones now got a smaller battery (due to the haptic engine part).

Apple A8

► remove from comparison Apple A8

The Apple A8 is a high-end ARM SoC (System on a Chip) launched in September 2014 alongside the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. The two CPU cores are clocked at 1.4 GHz (compared to the 1.3 GHz Apple A7) and are based on Apple's 2nd generation 64-bit architecture, called "Cyclone 2". Furthermore, the A8 integrates a PowerVR Series 6 (Rogue) GX6450 GPU and a 2x 32-bit LPDDR3-1333 memory controller.

Architecture 

With Cyclone 2, Apple have managed to improve the already high performance per clock of the original Cyclone core (Apple A7) by another 10 to 15 percent. Neither Qualcomm's Krait nor ARM's Cortex-A57 can compete with the resulting IPC. The exact design changes have not been revealed, but we would expect enlarged caches and registers as well as an optimized branch prediction. As an ARMv8 architecture, Cyclone 2 is 64-bit capable.

Performance

Thanks to its impressive performance per clock, the Apple 1.4 GHz dual-core is a tough opponent for other high-end SoCs like the Nvidia Tegra K1 (4 cores @ 2.3 GHz) or Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (4 cores @ 2.7 GHz). While the quad-core competitors win most multi-threaded benchmarks, the Apple A8 offers superior single-threaded performance, which is arguably more relevant for most everyday tasks like browsing. Overall, the A8 is one of the fastest smartphone SoCs as of late 2014.

Graphics

The SoC integrates a PowerVR Series 6 (Rogue) GX6450 GPU consisting of 4 clusters. Each cluster offers four FP16 and two FP32 ALUs, leading to a slightly higher shader performance than the former G6430. The core is predicted to be clocked relatively low at around 450 MHz (115 GFLOPS) to help reduce power consumption. According to our benchmarks, the GX6450 clearly outclasses the Adreno 330 in terms of 3D performance, but looses against Nvidia's more power hungry Tegra K1. Thus, the GX6450 is one of the fastest smartphone GPUs as of 2014 and can handle even the most demanding mobile games in high resolutions.

Power Consumption

In contrast to previous Apple SoCs, the A8 is manufactured by TSMC instead of Samsung. Using a brand-new 20 nm process, the SoC measures just 89 mm² and consists of about 2 billion transistors. Power consumption should be similar to or slightly below competing high-end SoCs by Qualcomm or Samsung.

Apple A8X

► remove from comparison Apple A8X

The Apple A8X is a high-end ARM SoC (System on a Chip) introduced in October 2014 alongside the iPad Air 2. The three CPU cores are clocked slightly higher than the two inside the Apple A8 (+100 MHz). Apple claims a 40% improvement over the 1.3 GHz Apple A7 compared to just 20% from the A8. Furthermore, the A8X integrates a much more powerful GPU (2x 4-core PowerVR Series 6XT (Rogue) GXA6850) as well as a 128-bit LPDDR3 memory controller.

Architecture 

With Cyclone 2, Apple has managed to improve the already high performance-per-clock of the original Cyclone core (Apple A7) by another 10 to 15 percent. Neither Qualcomm's Krait nor ARM's Cortex-A57 can compete with the resulting IPC. The exact design changes have not been revealed, but we would expect enlarged caches and registers as well as an optimized branch prediction. As an ARMv8 architecture, Cyclone 2 is 64-bit capable.

Performance

Compared to the previous Apple A7, the A8X offers about 20 - 70 percent more performance. Especially the multi-thread performance has been significantly improved thanks to the third CPU core, whereas the single-thread power is just slightly higher (~20 percent). According to Geekbench 3 scores, the A8X is the fastest mobile ARM-SoC as of late 2014. However, the chip clearly benefits from the 64-bit support in the iOS version of the benchmark. Without this advantage, Nvidia's Tegra K1 (Denver) dual-core is still somewhat faster in single-thread software (but slower in multi-thread tests).

Graphics

In contrast to previous speculations, the A8X integrates an 8-cluster PowerVR Series 6 (Rogue) GXA6850 consisting of two GX6450 GPUs (2x 4 clusters) instead of a single GX6650 (6 clusters). The name GXA6850 has been created by Anandtech, the design may also be called a GX6450MP2.

Each cluster offers four FP16 and two FP32 ALUs, leading to a compute power of about 230 GFLOPS FP32 at 450 MHz (clock rate estimated). The GXA6850 does not only beat the Qualcomm Adreno 420 (Snapdragon 805), but also the Nvidia Tegra K1 by a small margin. Thus, the GXA6850 is one of the fastest tablet GPUs as of 2014 and can handle even the most demanding mobile games in high resolutions. Among others, the GPU supports OpenGL 3.x/4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0 as well as DirectX 10.

Power Consumption

In contrast to previous Apple SoCs, the A8 und A8X are manufactured by TSMC instead of Samsung. Using a brand-new 20 nm process, the SoC consists of a whopping 3 billion transistors. Power consumption should be similar to competing high-end SoCs by Qualcomm or Samsung.

ModelApple A9Apple A8Apple A8X
SeriesApple Apple Apple
CodenameCyclone 3Cyclone 2Cyclone 2
Series: Cyclone 2
Apple A9X2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores Cyclone 3
Apple A9 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores Cyclone 3
Apple A8X1.5 GHz3 / 3 cores4 MB L3 Cyclone 2
Apple A8 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3 Cyclone 2
Apple A8X « 1.5 GHz3 / 3 cores4 MB L3 Cyclone 2
Apple A81.4 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3 Cyclone 2
Clock1800 MHz1400 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 23 / 3
Technology14/16 nm20 nm20 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set, PowerVR GX6450 (4 Cluster Rogue), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1333 Memory ControllerARMv8 Instruction Set, PowerVR GXA6850 (2x 4 Cluster Rogue), 128 Bit LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUApple A9 / PowerVR GT7600PowerVR GX6450PowerVR GX6650
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Transistors2000 Million3000 Million
Die Size89 mm2128 mm2

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
A9 +
min: 12854     avg: 13248     median: 13210.5 (11%)     max: 13717 Points
70%
A8 +
min: 9137     avg: 9282     median: 9259 (8%)     max: 9473 Points
79%
A8X +
10379 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A9 +
1094 Points (13%)
128%
1 A8X +
1400 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A9 +
1093 Points (12%)
133%
1 A8X +
1449 Points (17%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9 +
531 Points (22%)
62%
1 A8 +
328 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9 +
970 Points (2%)
65%
1 A8 +
627 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A8X +
381 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A8X +
1060 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
A9 +
2556 Points (26%)
62%
A8 +
1591 Points (16%)
71%
A8X +
1821 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
A9 +
4459 Points (5%)
62%
A8 +
2759 Points (3%)
98%
A8X +
4357 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A9 +
min: 2503     avg: 2527     median: 2526.5 (34%)     max: 2550 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A9 +
min: 4286     avg: 4359     median: 4359 (11%)     max: 4432 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
A9 +
min: 4386     avg: 4412     median: 4422 (7%)     max: 4429 Points
70%
A8 +
3097 Points (5%)
102%
A8X +
4530 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
A9 +
min: 2533     avg: 2537     median: 2538 (38%)     max: 2539 Points
68%
A8 +
1714 Points (26%)
72%
A8X +
1816 Points (27%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A8 +
min: 2864     avg: 2879     median: 2881.5 (5%)     max: 2889 Points
155%
1 A8X +
4477 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A8 +
min: 1609     avg: 1615     median: 1614.5 (32%)     max: 1620 Points
112%
1 A8X +
1812 Points (35%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
A9 +
min: 1225     avg: 1260     median: 1260 (43%)     max: 1295 MFLOPS
114%
A8 +
min: 1439     avg: 1440     median: 1440 (49%)     max: 1441 MFLOPS
193%
A8X +
2429 MFLOPS (82%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
A9 +
min: 669     avg: 677     median: 677 (66%)     max: 685 MFLOPS
113%
A8 +
min: 766     avg: 767     median: 767 (75%)     max: 768 MFLOPS
151%
A8X +
1021 MFLOPS (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
A9 +
min: 1458     avg: 1656     median: 1712 (2%)     max: 1743 ms
97%
A8 +
min: 4470     avg: 4524     median: 4514 (5%)     max: 4597 ms
99%
A8X +
2396 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
A9 +
223 ms (2%)
99%
A8 +
min: 340     avg: 354.9     median: 347.2 (4%)     max: 385 ms
99%
A8X +
291.1 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A8 +
min: 211.3     avg: 286.6     median: 286.6 (3%)     max: 361.8 ms
100%
1 A8X +
326 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
A9 +
min: 15967     avg: 16716     median: 16375 (15%)     max: 18148 Points
45%
A8 +
min: 7225     avg: 7408     median: 7377 (7%)     max: 7653 Points
64%
A8X +
10512 Points (9%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
A9 +
min: 58869     avg: 58977     median: 58976.5 (59%)     max: 59084 Points
83%
A8 +
min: 30877     avg: 43443     median: 49093 (50%)     max: 50360 Points
107%
A8X +
63292 Points (64%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 A9 +
min: 126969     avg: 129767     median: 128706 (44%)     max: 133626 Points
79%
1 A8X +
101062 Points (34%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
A9 +
min: 46285     avg: 48479     median: 48849 (6%)     max: 49934 Points
90%
A8 +
min: 43696     avg: 44118     median: 44118 (6%)     max: 44540 Points
150%
A8X +
73235 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A9 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Apple A8 → 81% n=12

Average Benchmarks Apple A8X → 107% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 06:24:04

#0 checking url part for id 7085 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6376 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6441 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.208s ... 0.209s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.209s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7085 +0.004s ... 0.213s

#8 got single benchmarks 7085 +0.016s ... 0.229s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6376 +0.003s ... 0.233s

#10 got single benchmarks 6376 +0.014s ... 0.247s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 6441 +0.003s ... 0.25s

#12 got single benchmarks 6441 +0.011s ... 0.262s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.262s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.102s ... 0.364s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.37s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.075s ... 0.445s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.445s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)