Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9425 vs AMD E2-9010 vs AMD E2-9000

AMD A9-9425

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9425

The AMD A9-9425 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2018. Compared to the one year older A9-9420, the 9425 has a 100 MHz higher CPU clock speed (base and boost) as well as a marginally faster iGPU. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked at 3.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at up to 900 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video decoder and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The average 9425 in our database proves to be a rather slow CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of the Intel Core i3-4012Y. Much like it is with N-class Intel chips, expect a system built around an A9-9425 to perform poorly in all but the most basic tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above.

Power consumption

This A9 series chip has a default TDP of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that somewhat with 10 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value; clock speeds and performance will be reduced as a result. By going for the lowest value, it will be possible to build a passively cooled system around the APU.

Last but not the least, the AMD A9-9425 is manufactured on a 28 nm process for very, very low energy efficiency, as of 2022.

AMD E2-9010

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9010

The AMD E2-9010 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in mid 2016. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.0-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9010 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

AMD E2-9000

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9000

The AMD E2-9000 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in 2017. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the older E2-9010, the E2-9000 offers a lower base speed (1.8 versus 2 GHz).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9000 with 10 Watts (compared to the 9010 at 15W). This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD A9-9425AMD E2-9010AMD E2-9000
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 « 3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9010 « 2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-9420e - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-9000 « 1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3100 - 3700 MHz2000 - 2200 MHz1800 - 2200 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt10-15 Watt10 Watt
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
FeaturesDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comproducts.amd.comwww.amd.com
SocketBGABGA

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 A9-9425 +
195 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 A9-9425 +
284 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
125 Points (1%)
91 Points (1%)
84 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
76 Points (23%)
53 Points (16%)
47 Points (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.5 Points (2%)
1.1 Points (1%)
1 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.9 Points (22%)
0.6 Points (16%)
0.6 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2686 Points (16%)
1871 Points (11%)
1787 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4338 Points (3%)
3268 Points (2%)
2897 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
802 s (9%)
1142 s (13%)
1242 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
25.8 s (5%)
37.1 s (7%)
36.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
891 Points (1%)
769 Points (1%)
744 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.7 fps (3%)
7.4 fps (3%)
6.3 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
50.5 fps (12%)
39.2 fps (9%)
35.7 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (2%)
0.7 GB/s (2%)
0.7 GB/s (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 A9-9425 +
2314 Points (5%)
1556 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17 s (4%)
27.9 s (6%)
26.9 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
38.2 s (2%)
61.5 s (3%)
59.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
853 s (4%)
1296 s (6%)
1304 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-9000 +
3146 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1527 Points (4%)
1241 Points (3%)
1199 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A9-9425 +
16539 Points (13%)
11949 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 A9-9425 +
15856 Points (13%)
10209 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
19290 Points (16%)
12726 Points (11%)
11528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1269 Points (3%)
919 Points (2%)
914 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1823 Points (3%)
1268 Points (2%)
1255 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 A9-9425 +
705 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2244 Points (22%)
1610 Points (16%)
1591 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3636 Points (4%)
2402 Points (3%)
2461 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1512 Points (21%)
102%
1 E2-9000 +
1543 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2307 Points (6%)
103%
1 E2-9000 +
2371 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
3323 Points (6%)
2348 Points (4%)
2323 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2039 Points (40%)
1415 Points (28%)
1430 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3605 Points (6%)
2484 Points (4%)
2439 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2228 Points (33%)
1516 Points (23%)
1526 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4145 Points (33%)
3104 Points (25%)
2993 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3069 Points (28%)
2675 Points (24%)
2893 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5175 Points (10%)
3377 Points (7%)
2847 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4798 Points (10%)
2957 Points (6%)
2914 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4518 Points (12%)
3062 Points (8%)
2894 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2466 ms (3%)
3043 ms (4%)
3175 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
176.3 ms (2%)
234.5 ms (3%)
258.9 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
13562 Points (12%)
10419 Points (9%)
10575 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 A9-9425 +
76 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9425 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9010 → 78% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9000 → 75% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 23. 19:49:18

#0 checking url part for id 11291 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8183 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9294 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11291 +0.002s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 11291 +0.012s ... 0.046s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8183 +0.002s ... 0.049s

#10 got single benchmarks 8183 +0.008s ... 0.056s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9294 +0.002s ... 0.059s

#12 got single benchmarks 9294 +0.009s ... 0.067s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.322s ... 0.389s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.389s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)