Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9420e vs AMD A6-9210

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

AMD A6-9210

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9210

The AMD A6-9210 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A6-9210 is the mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.4-2.8 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9210 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 600 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9210 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD A9-9420eAMD A6-9210
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
Clock <=2500? MHz2400 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L1 Cache1 MB
TDP10-15 Watt
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge A6-9210

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 02:07:49

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8182 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#20 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0s ... 0.012s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#24 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 8182 +0s ... 0.018s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.019s

#28 got single benchmarks 8182 +0.005s ... 0.025s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#31 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.025s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#33 return log +0.004s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)