AMD A8-4555M vs AMD A10-4655M

AMD A8-4555M

► remove AMD A8-4555M

The AMD A8-4555M is a mobile ultra-low-voltage (ULV) quad-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q4 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 1.6 GHz CPU (up to 2.4 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a relatively fast Radeon HD 7600G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A8-4555M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A8-4555M performs somewhere between the ULV Pentium and Core i3 series from Intel. Because of the lower frequency, the A8-4555M is 15 - 20 % slower than the A10-4655M (25 W TDP). Nonetheless, CPU performance of the AMD processor is sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and even light video editing or gaming.

The APU integrates a DirectX 11-compatible GPU called Radeon HD 7600G.

The power consumption of the A8-4555M APU is rated at 19 Watt TDP and therefore comparable to Intels ULV-processors. Consequently, the A8-4555M is best suited for thin-and-light notebooks.

AMD A10-4655M

► remove AMD A10-4655M

The AMD A10-4655M is a mobile low-voltage (LV) quad-core processor based on the Trinity architecture. Officially introduced in Q2 2012, it is the direct successor to the Llano A-series of APUs (Accelerated Processing Unit). The processing unit is manufactured in 32nm SOI and integrates a 2.0 GHz CPU (up to 2.8 GHz w/ Turbo Core) with a relatively fast Radeon HD 7620G GPU alongside a dual-channel memory controller, video de- and encoders and a northbridge.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture, called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A10-4655M includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point cores total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

When compared to previous Bulldozer cores, AMD has managed to improve upon the IPC (instructions per clock) performance of Trinity cores while allowing for higher clock frequencies. However, when compared to its Llano predecessor, the multithreaded performance of Trinity has only been slightly improved. The enhanced Turbo Core 3.0 feature functions well in speeding up single threaded performance, although it is still not on the same level as Intel’s Turbo Boost equivalent. Regardless, AMD has managed to include other features as well, such as the AVX extension (including FMA) and support for AES encryption.

In terms of raw general performance, the A10-4655M performs similar to the A8-4500M and the Llano-based A8-3500M. Single-threaded workloads can especially benefit from the new architecture and the updated Turbo Core functionality. If compared to Intels Core-i3-series, the A10-4655M offers less performance in most cases. Nonetheless, CPU performance from the AMD processor is sufficient for all daily workloads like Office, Internet browsing and even light video editing or gaming.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 7620G offers all 384 shader cores of the Trinity chip and, thanks to Turbo Core, will operate anywhere between 360 to 497 MHz depending on the current application demand. On average, the performance of the HD 7620G GPU is comparable to a dedicated Radeon HD 7610M and even faster than the HD Graphics 4000 as found in Intel’s Ivy Bridge.

The power consumption of the A10-4655M APU is rated at 25 Watt TDP and is therefore comparable to previous LV-processors. Consequently, the A10-4655M is best suited for 12-inch notebooks or larger.

AMD A8-4555MAMD A10-4655M
AMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
TrinityTrinity
: A-Series Trinity
AMD A10-4600M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4657M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4655M2000 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4500M (compare)1900 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4557M (compare)1900 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A8-4555M1600 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-4400M (compare)2700 - 3200 MHz2
AMD A4-4300M (compare)2500 - 3000 MHz2
AMD A6-4455M (compare)2100 - 2600 MHz2
AMD A4-4355M (compare)1900 - 2400 MHz2
AMD A10-4600M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-4657M (compare)2300 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-4655M2000 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4500M (compare)1900 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4557M (compare)1900 - 2800 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-4555M1600 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-4400M (compare)2700 - 3200 MHz2
AMD A4-4300M (compare)2500 - 3000 MHz2
AMD A6-4455M (compare)2100 - 2600 MHz2
AMD A4-4355M (compare)1900 - 2400 MHz2
1600 - 2400 MHz2000 - 2800 MHz
4 MB4 MB
4 / 44 / 4
19 25
1303 1303
32 32
246 mm2246 mm2
SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMASSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, FMA
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7600G (320 - 424 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 7620G (360 - 497 MHz)

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (3%)     max: 1 Points
1.7 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.5 Points (24%)
0.5 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1382     avg: 1506.7     median: 1555 (17%)     max: 1583 Points
1137 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3681     avg: 3753     median: 3757 (8%)     max: 3821 Points
4530 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 3491     avg: 4831.5     median: 5170 (7%)     max: 5494 Points
6495 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 1593     avg: 1871     median: 1891 (18%)     max: 2109 Points
2280 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 1230     avg: 1265.3     median: 1282 (15%)     max: 1284 seconds
1280 seconds (15%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 37     avg: 41.6     median: 40 (8%)     max: 47 seconds
40 seconds (8%)
WinRAR - Result
min: 1468     avg: 1936.5     median: 1936 (23%)     max: 2405 KB/s
1263 KB/s (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
min: 3     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (0%)     max: 5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
min: 13     avg: 20.9     median: 20 (7%)     max: 28 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (9%)
0.1 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.8 GB/s (4%)
1 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1197     avg: 1719.5     median: 1876 (13%)     max: 1928 Points
min: 2153     avg: 2160.5     median: 2160 (14%)     max: 2168 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
41 Seconds (9%)
22 Seconds (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 92     avg: 93.7     median: 94 (4%)     max: 95 Seconds
80 Seconds (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2456     avg: 2522.7     median: 2491 (11%)     max: 2621 Seconds
2077 Seconds (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 12110     avg: 20422     median: 24156 (11%)     max: 25000 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 9000     avg: 13711.3     median: 15750 (12%)     max: 16384 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 3310     avg: 3526.5     median: 3526 (5%)     max: 3743 Points
5259 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 1097     avg: 1531     median: 1654 (9%)     max: 1719 points
2236 points (12%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
19991 Points (13%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1223 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
2102 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A8-4555M → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-4655M → 107%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)