Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Apple A6x vs Rockchip RK3168

Apple A6x

► remove from comparison

The Apple A6x is a dual-core-SoC (System on a Chip) with ARM compatible CPU cores (ARMv7s instruction set). Both can be clocked at up to 1400 MHz depending on the load. It is used in the iPad 4 and compared to the A6 in the iPhone 5, the A6x offers a faster GPU (PowerVR SGX544MP4).

The CPU-Performance of the A6x is similar to the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T, while the GPU is about as fast as the Adreno 320.

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3168 is a low-end ARM SoC designed primarily for smartphones. It integrates two Cortex-A9 CPU cores with NEON extension, a PowerVR SGX 540 graphics card (400 MHz) and a memory controller for low-power (LP-) DDR2/DDR3. The performance should be comparable to other similarly clocked Cortex-A9 SoCs such as the Samsung Exynos 4210. Thanks to its 28nm manufacturing, the RK3168 is relatively power efficient and should enable longer battery life.

ModelApple A6xRockchip RK3168
SeriesApple
Series:
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
» Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
» Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
Clock1400 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads22 / 2
Technology32 nm28 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)
Manufacturer RK3168

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8647 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8627 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8850 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A6x +
1012 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A6x +
2053 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A6x +
2262 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A6x +
1330 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A6x +
1768 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6x +
1424 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6x +
781 Points (16%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 A6x +
654 MFLOPS (22%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 A6x +
382.4 MFLOPS (37%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A6x +
895 ms (8%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A6x → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 08:32:18

#0 checking url part for id 3609 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.068s ... 0.071s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.073s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#33 composed specs +0s ... 0.073s

#34 did output specs +0s ... 0.073s

#35 getting avg benchmarks for device 3609 +0s ... 0.074s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#37 got single benchmarks 3609 +0.006s ... 0.08s

#38 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0s ... 0.081s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#41 got single benchmarks 4129 +0.004s ... 0.086s

#42 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.086s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.089s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.091s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.027s ... 0.117s

#57 return log +0.004s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)