AMD A6-9220C vs AMD A6-9225

AMD A6-9220C

► remove AMD A6-9220C

The AMD A6-9220C is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for Chromebooks (7th APU generation from 2016), which was announced early 2019. Compared to the A6-9220, the 9220C is rated at a reduced TDP of 6 versus 15 Watt and also reduced clock speeds. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8 - 2.7 GHz (versus 2.5 - 2.9 GHz on the A6-9220).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220C should be noticeably slower than the old A6-9220. AMD compares the performance against the Pentium N4200 in ChromeOS and sees the A6-9220C clearly ahead. The efficiency should be worse however, due to the old manufacturing process.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is a bit controversal, as AMD states 3 compute cores which should translate to 192 shaders.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220C with 6 Watts which should enable thin and light (even fanless) Chromebooks.

AMD A6-9225

► remove AMD A6-9225

The AMD A6-9225 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2018. Compared to the 2 years older A4-9220, the A4-9225 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.6 - 3 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9225 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410. Therefore, it is in the absolute low end of 2018 mobile CPUs and only suited for basic tasks.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9225 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

AMD A6-9220CAMD A6-9225
AMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Stoney RidgeStoney Ridge
: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3100 - 3700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2500? MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3000 - 3600 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2500 - 2900 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-9220C1800 - 2700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2400 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2200 - 2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2000 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1800 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 compare3100 - 3700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare - 2500? MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3000 - 3600 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-92252600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2500 - 2900 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1800 - 2700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2400 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2200 - 2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2000 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1800 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
1800 - 2700 MHz2600 - 3000 MHz
160 KB160 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
6 10-15
1200 1200
28 28
124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
90 °C90 °C
BGABGA
Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 A6-9225 +
182 Points (33%)
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 A6-9225 +
273 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
min: 96     avg: 109     median: 108.5 (2%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
73 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
min: 1.03     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
0.9 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
2532 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 A6-9225 +
4193 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
852 seconds (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
26.3 seconds (5%)
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 A6-9225 +
852 KB/s (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1 A6-9225 +
9.1 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1 A6-9225 +
48.9 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1 A6-9225 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1 A6-9225 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
2132 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
20.2 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
45.5 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
968 Seconds (4%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1568 points (7%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 A6-9225 +
16446 Points (11%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 A6-9225 +
15678 Points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
100%
1 A6-9225 +
16322 Points (19%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1304 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1821 Points (6%)
3DMark - Time Spy CPU 2560x1440
100%
1 A6-9225 +
664 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3899 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 A6-9225 +
2849 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 A6-9225 +
4490 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 A6-9225 +
4014 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3936 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3103 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1855 Points (38%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3323 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1974 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1920 Points (30%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3035 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
1980 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
3190 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
2657 ms (4%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 A6-9225 +
204 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
100%
1 A6-9225 +
11962 Points (23%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9225 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)